IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/tijaxx/v59y2024i01ns1094406024500033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reconsideration of IFRS Adoption and Audit Fees: Evidence from UK Private Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Lin Hsu

    (Department of Accounting & Finance, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0QU, UK)

  • Ni-Yun Chen

    (Department of Business Management, College of Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan)

Abstract

SynopsisThe research problemThis paper examined whether firms’ decision to switch from the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to the new Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in the United Kingdom (New UK GAAP) affects their audit fees.MotivationThe New UK GAAP was introduced by the UK regulators to enhance the comparability of financial reports and to reduce the high financial reporting costs associated with IFRS. We aimed to provide evidence on whether the reduced frameworks of IFRS, like the New UK GAAP, are a more cost-effective option. Furthermore, only very few studies analyzed the impact of abandoning IFRS on audit fees, and these found inconsistent results using the public firm data. We aimed to extend the current literature by using the private firm data.The test hypothesesOur first set of hypotheses considered whether the switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP is associated with audit fees. Our second hypothesis tested whether there is a difference in any such association between larger and smaller firms.Target populationWe focused on the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firms that have previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS.Adopted methodologyWe used regression analyses, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses, various matching methods for robustness, and analyses of firms’ financial reports.AnalysesUsing the UK private (i.e., nonlisted) firm data for the period 2014–2019, we examined the impact of switching from IFRS to the New UK GAAP on audit fees. The data for regression and DID analyses were obtained from the FAME database. We also downloaded the financial reports of two firms from Companies House to analyze the differences in their reports before and after the switch to the New UK GAAP.FindingsWe found that firms’ decision to switch from IFRS to the New UK GAAP significantly reduced their audit fees, with larger firms experiencing an additional reduction in their audit fees following the switch. Through examining the real examples of firms’ financial reports, we found consistent evidence that firms turning away from IFRS did take advantage of the disclosure exemptions contained within the New UK GAAP, resulting in reduced disclosure, which may explain the reduced audit fees. Overall, our findings suggest that using full IFRS may still be burdensome for the sampled firms that previously voluntarily adopted the IFRS. The findings also imply that an accounting standard consistent with IFRS but requiring less disclosure, such as the New UK GAAP or the IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities, may be welcomed by practitioners and represents a useful alternative for standard setters.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Lin Hsu & Ni-Yun Chen, 2024. "The Reconsideration of IFRS Adoption and Audit Fees: Evidence from UK Private Firms," The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 59(01), pages 1-39, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:59:y:2024:i:01:n:s1094406024500033
    DOI: 10.1142/S1094406024500033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1094406024500033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1094406024500033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    IFRS; New UK GAAP; audit fees; private firms;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:59:y:2024:i:01:n:s1094406024500033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/tija .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.