IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jikmxx/v16y2017i01ns0219649217500095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing Knowledge Construction in Online Health Group Discussion

Author

Listed:
  • Achmad Ghazali

    (School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha No. 10, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Alexei Tretiakov

    (#x2020;School of Management, College of Business, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand)

  • Dematria Pringgabayu

    (School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha No. 10, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Dany Muhammad Athory Ramdlany

    (School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesha No. 10, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia)

Abstract

The ongoing transition to the patient-centred healthcare paradigm suggests that patients adopt an active role in managing their health conditions. As a result, the Internet is becoming an important source of health-related information. Internet-based health support groups allow patients to access diverse information relevant to their particular situation by participating in online discussions. The quality of such information may have effects on the patients’ health outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of knowledge construction in health support group online discussions on perceived information quality, information quality from the perspective of information consumers, and on information integrity, that is, validity from the point of view of the current state of scientific knowledge. It was hypothesised that knowledge construction results in better perceived information quality and in higher information integrity. A health support group online discussion site devoted to weight management was used as a source of data. Quantitative content analysis was used with a discussion thread as a unit of analysis. Based on the findings, the study suggested that moderators of health support group online discussions should promote explicitation or lower level knowledge construction by encouraging clarifications and refinements of health-related recommendations. Moreover, participation of qualified health practitioners is desirable to promote health-related behaviours based on evidence-based knowledge and to expose recommendations that have uncertain or even dangerous effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Achmad Ghazali & Alexei Tretiakov & Dematria Pringgabayu & Dany Muhammad Athory Ramdlany, 2017. "Analyzing Knowledge Construction in Online Health Group Discussion," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:16:y:2017:i:01:n:s0219649217500095
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219649217500095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219649217500095
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219649217500095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mead, Nicola & Bower, Peter, 2000. "Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(7), pages 1087-1110, October.
    2. Andreas I. Nicolaou & D. Harrison McKnight, 2006. "Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 332-351, December.
    3. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    4. Kimiz Dalkir, 2011. "Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262015080, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Xue, 2021. "Determinants of consumers’ continuance intention to use social recommender systems: A self-regulation perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Viswanath Venkatesh & James Y. L. Thong & Frank K. Y. Chan & Paul J. H. Hu, 2016. "Managing Citizens’ Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 87-111, March.
    3. Sun, Jonghak & Teng, James T.C., 2017. "The construct of information systems use benefits: Theoretical explication of its underlying dimensions and the development of a measurement scale," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 400-416.
    4. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Hyojung Tak & Gregory Ruhnke & Ya-Chen Shih, 2015. "The Association between Patient-Centered Attributes of Care and Patient Satisfaction," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 8(2), pages 187-197, April.
    6. Mario Silic & Andrea Back, 2016. "The Influence of Risk Factors in Decision-Making Process for Open Source Software Adoption," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 151-185, January.
    7. Mitchell, Ellen M.H. & Kwizera, Amata & Usta, Momade & Gebreselassie, Hailemichael, 2010. "Choosing early pregnancy termination methods in Urban Mozambique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 62-70, July.
    8. Yuxuan Li & Xin Miao & Dequan Zheng & Yanhong Tang, 2019. "Corporate Public Transparency on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Political Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Zhiyi Zhuo, 2019. "Research on using Six Sigma management to improve bank customer satisfaction," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Moksh Matta & Hasan Cavusoglu, 2022. "The Dark Side of Technological Modularity: Opportunistic Information Hiding During Interorganizational System Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1072-1092, September.
    11. Ion Popa & Simona Cătălina Ștefan, 2019. "Modeling the Pathways of Knowledge Management Towards Social and Economic Outcomes of Health Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Zhang, Yufei & Voorhees, Clay M. & Lin, Chen & Chiang, Jeongwen & Hult, G.Tomas M. & Calantone, Roger J., 2022. "Information Search and Product Returns Across Mobile and Traditional Online Channels," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 260-276.
    13. Verhagen, Tibert & Meents, Selmar, 2007. "A Framework for Developing Semantic Differentials in IS research: Assessing the Meaning of Electronic Marketplace Quality (EMQ)," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Nor Azmaniza Azizam & Siti Noorsuriani Maon & Leny Suzana & Nor Intan Shamimi Abdul Aziz, 2018. "Factors Influencing Selected Health Outcome among Patients Attending Universiti Teknologi MARA Medical Centre," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 500-511, July.
    15. Chiyao Sun & Ji’an Liu & Liana Razmerita & Yanru Xu & Jia Qi, 2022. "Higher Education to Support Sustainable Development: The Influence of Information Literacy and Online Learning Process on Chinese Postgraduates’ Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    16. .Ibrahim Halil Efend.iou{g}lu & Gokhan Akel & Bekir Deu{g}.irmenc.i & Dilek Aydou{g}du & Kamile Elmasou{g}lu & Hande Begum Bum.in Doyduk & Arzu c{S}eker & Hatice Bahc{c}e, 2023. "The Mediating Effect of Blockchain Technology on the Cryptocurrency Purchase Intention," Papers 2310.05970, arXiv.org.
    17. Christoph Voegeli, 2019. "Understanding the Current State and Future Directions of Hotel Sector Knowledge Management: A Literature Review," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 118-145, June.
    18. Estefanía Palazuelos & Ángel Herrero Crespo & Javier Montoya del Corte, 2018. "Effect of perceived default risk and accounting information quality on the decision to grant credit to SMEs," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 121-141, May.
    19. S, Suresh Kumar & S R, Shehnaz & Salam, Shiny, 2020. "Resurgence of small eateries– The successful business model of online Food Apps in major cities of Kerala," MPRA Paper 109185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Dr. Neelotpaul Banerjee & Santosh Sah, 2012. "A Comparative Study of Customers¡¯ Perceptions of Service Quality Dimensions between Public and Private Banks in India," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(5), pages 33-44, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:16:y:2017:i:01:n:s0219649217500095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jikm/jikm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.