IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jeapmx/v21y2019i02ns1464333219500091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explanations for the Quality of Biodiversity Inputs to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Areas with High Biodiversity Value

Author

Listed:
  • Felicity Swanepoel

    (Green-scene Environmental, Unit 4, 348 Voortrekker Road, Maitland, Cape Town, South Africa)

  • Francois Retief

    (#x2020;Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University (Potchefstroom campus), South Africa)

  • Alan Bond

    (#x2020;Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University (Potchefstroom campus), South Africa‡School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom)

  • Jenny Pope

    (#x2020;Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University (Potchefstroom campus), South Africa§School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Australia)

  • Angus Morrison-Saunders

    (#x2020;Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University (Potchefstroom campus), South Africa§School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Australia)

  • Morgan Houptfleisch

    (#xA7;§Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources Sciences, Namibia University of Science and Technology, Namibia)

  • Monica Fundingsland

    (#xB6;¶Equinor, Norway)

Abstract

Biodiversity is under significant threat globally and therefore the biodiversity input to environmental impact assessment (EIA) is important. The quality of biodiversity inputs needs to be high if biodiversity is to be protected, especially in areas with high biodiversity value. Here, we follow-up quality reviews of biodiversity inputs to EIA reports, through interviews with the biodiversity specialists who authored the biodiversity inputs, in order to find explanations for the quality results. This is the first quality review research to systematically engage with biodiversity specialists in this way. The biodiversity specialists highlighted professional registration as a key factor supporting strengths around professional conduct and gathering of baseline information. Weaknesses identified relate to review areas dealing with alternatives, public participation, prediction, as well as management actions and monitoring arrangements, which seem to be the result of a lack of understanding and/or agreement on the role of the biodiversity specialists in the EIA process. The research results suggest that ideally biodiversity inputs should not be seen as a one-off contribution but rather as an iterative contribution during different stages of the EIA process.

Suggested Citation

  • Felicity Swanepoel & Francois Retief & Alan Bond & Jenny Pope & Angus Morrison-Saunders & Morgan Houptfleisch & Monica Fundingsland, 2019. "Explanations for the Quality of Biodiversity Inputs to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Areas with High Biodiversity Value," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(02), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:21:y:2019:i:02:n:s1464333219500091
    DOI: 10.1142/S1464333219500091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333219500091
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1464333219500091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongsheng Zhang & Wen-Qi Luo & Shangzhao Yang & Jinna Yu, 2023. "Impact of Covid-19 on economic recovery: empirical analysis from China and global economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 57-78, February.
    2. Hsu, Ching-Chi & Chau, Ka Yin & Chien, FengSheng, 2023. "Natural resource volatility and financial development during Covid-19: Implications for economic recovery," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Li, Ying & Mehmood, Nasir & Iqbal, Nadeem, 2022. "Natural resource abundance and financial development: A case study of emerging (E−15) economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Telfah, Sadeq & Chau, Ka Yin & Tran, Trung Kien & Bui, Anh Tuan & Tai, Nguyen Tan & Phan, Thi Thu Hien, 2023. "Role of financial markets and natural resource utilization in green economic recovery: Evidence from selected developing economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Yujuan Zhai & Libo Hao & Yanhong Zhang & Ye Li & Zhaoli Liu, 2021. "Wetland Biodiversity Disturbance Evaluation Induced by a Water Conservancy Project in the Flooded Plain of the Huolin River Lower Reaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Mo Chen & Rabia Bashir, 2022. "Role of e-commerce and resource utilization for sustainable business development: goal of economic recovery after Covid-19," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2663-2685, November.
    7. Liu, Hongda & Huang, Feipeng & Huang, Jialiang, 2022. "Measuring the coordination decision of renewable energy as a natural resource contracts based on rights structure and corporate social responsibility from economic recovery," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:21:y:2019:i:02:n:s1464333219500091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jeapm/jeapm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.