IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v15y2011i02ns1363919611003210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational Implications Of Open Innovation: An Analysis Of Inter-Industry Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • TOMMASO BUGANZA

    (Politecnico di Milano, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Piazza L. da Vinci 32 - 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • DAVIDE CHIARONI

    (Politecnico di Milano, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Piazza L. da Vinci 32 - 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • GABRIELE COLOMBO

    (Politecnico di Milano, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Piazza L. da Vinci 32 - 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • FEDERICO FRATTINI

    (Politecnico di Milano, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Piazza L. da Vinci 32 - 20133 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

Although Open Innovation has been a highly researched and debated topic in the last decade, many relevant issues remain largely unexplored so far. An interesting question to address is whether and how Open Innovation has a dissimilar impact on the organization and management systems of firms working in different industries. The paper investigates this topic using a rich empirical basis gathered through 8 case studies involving large Italian corporations, which operate in heterogeneous industries. Managers will find a number of insights about how to streamline the adoption and institutionalization of Open Innovation practices, taking into account the specificity of the firm and the industry in which it works. The empirical analysis shows that some firms tend to leverage exploitative inter-organizational networks, characterized by strong ties and by the presence of several heterogeneous actors such as customers, suppliers and universities. Moreover, they establish dedicated units to institutionalize structured and formalized screening processes for managing Open Innovation projects. Other firms enter instead into networking relationships mainly for explorative purposes, establishing weak ties with public research centers or universities. They adopt more informal,ad-hocstructures and evaluation procedures, very often embedded in the already existing R&D departments. The paper explains that such differences descend from a number of industry-level variables, i.e., R&D intensity, strength of the appropriability regime, turbulence and uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Tommaso Buganza & Davide Chiaroni & Gabriele Colombo & Federico Frattini, 2011. "Organisational Implications Of Open Innovation: An Analysis Of Inter-Industry Patterns," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 423-455.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:15:y:2011:i:02:n:s1363919611003210
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919611003210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919611003210
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919611003210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Fuster Olivares & Jose Miguel Giner Perez & Mª Carmen Tolosa Bailen, 2004. "The new economy in Spain: a regional analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa04p284, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changbyung Yoon & Keeeun Lee & Byungun Yoon & Omar Toulan, 2017. "Typology and Success Factors of Collaboration for Sustainable Growth in the IT Service Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Hezam Haidar & Karine Evrard Samuel & Jean-François Boujut, 2019. "Influential factors of initiating open innovation collaboration between universities and SMEs: Systematic Literature Review," Post-Print hal-02184337, HAL.
    3. Majbritt Rostgaard Evald & Ann Højbjerg Clarke & Britta Boyd, 2021. "An Open Innovation Project Typology of Exploration and Exploitation: Managerial Implications and Empirical Applications," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 740-755, June.
    4. Jokubauskienė Raminta & Vaitkienė Rimgailė, 2017. "Assumptions of Customer Knowledge Enablement in the Open Innovation Process," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 31(1), pages 55-69, August.
    5. Alessandro Sarra & Claudio Berardino & Davide Quaglione, 2019. "Deindustrialization and the technological intensity of manufacturing subsystems in the European Union," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(1), pages 205-243, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sassen, Saskia, 2008. "Two stops in today's new global geographies: shaping novel labor supplies and employment regimes," Asuntos de Género 5815, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Lawrence M. Lekhanya & Roger B. Mason, 2014. "Selected Key External Factors Influencing the Success of Rural Small and Medium Enterprises in South Africa," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 331-348.
    3. Upham, Paul & Shackley, Simon, 2006. "The case of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: Implications for governance of renewable energy planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(15), pages 2161-2172, October.
    4. Ryuta Takashima & Makoto Goto & Motoh Tsujimura, 2010. "Irreversible Investment, Operating Flexibility, And Time Lags," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 27(02), pages 271-286.
    5. Reza Kia & Nikbakhsh Javadian & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar & Mohammad Saidi-Mehrabad, 2013. "A Simulated Annealing For Intra-Cell Layout Design Of Dynamic Cellular Manufacturing Systems With Route Selection, Purchasing Machines And Cell Reconfiguration," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 30(04), pages 1-41.
    6. Luca Lambertini & Gianpaolo Rossini, 2009. "The Gains From Cooperative R&D With A Concave Technology And Spillovers," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 77-85.
    7. Supachai Pathumnakul & Chatklao Sanmuang & Nawapak Eua-Anant & Kullapapruk Piewthongngam, 2012. "Locating Sugar Cane Loading Stations Under Variations In Cane Supply," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 29(05), pages 1-17.
    8. Rhiannon Pugh, 2018. "Questioning the implementation of smart specialisation: Regional innovation policy and semi-autonomous regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(3), pages 530-547, May.
    9. Patrick Leblond, 2006. "The Political Stability and Growth Pact is Dead: Long Live the Economic Stability and Growth Pact," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44, pages 969-990, December.
    10. Valentina Lazzarotti & Raffaella Manzini, 2009. "Different Modes Of Open Innovation: A Theoretical Framework And An Empirical Study," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 615-636.
    11. Chung-Ho Chen, 2008. "Economic Production Run Length And Warranty Period For Product With Weibull Lifetime," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(06), pages 753-764.
    12. Shinji Takagi, 2007. "Managing Flexibility: Japanese Exchange Rate Policy, 1971–2007," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 52(03), pages 335-361.
    13. Hwee Kwan Chow & Peter Nicholas Kriz & Roberto S. Mariano & Augustine H. H. Tan, 2010. "Monetary Policy Cooperation To Support Asian Economic Integration," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 55(01), pages 83-101.
    14. Jeffrey (Jun) Chen & Yun Guan & Ivy Tang, 2020. "Optimal Contracting of Pension Incentive: Evidence of Currency Risk Management in Multinational Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-29, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:15:y:2011:i:02:n:s1363919611003210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.