IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v17y2014i1p77-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System Security Requirements Analysis:A Smart Grid Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nauman Zafar
  • Edin Arnautovic
  • Ali Diabat
  • Davor Svetinovic

Abstract

One of the main concerns in development and operation of mission‐critical systems is system security. It is of critical importance to properly specify and implement system security requirements. In this paper, we apply a system security requirements analysis method to elicit, specify, categorize, and prioritize the system security requirements on the smart grid as a complex system‐of‐systems case study. In particular, we apply the Security Quality Requirements Engineering (SQUARE) method as a representative system security requirements analysis method. The main contributions of this research are the smart grid customer domain security requirements specification and its analysis from the system‐of‐systems perspective. We elicited a large proportion of system and system‐of‐systems vulnerabilities and requirements, and used them to specify secure smart grid intersystem interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nauman Zafar & Edin Arnautovic & Ali Diabat & Davor Svetinovic, 2014. "System Security Requirements Analysis:A Smart Grid Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 77-88, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:77-88
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21252
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark W. Maier, 1998. "Architecting principles for systems‐of‐systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(4), pages 267-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Selamawit Woldeamlak & Ali Diabat & Davor Svetinovic, 2016. "Goal‐Oriented Requirements Engineering for Research‐Intensive Complex Systems: A Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 322-333, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blake Roberts & Thomas Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2016. "Engineered Resilience for Complex Systems as a Predictor for Cost Overruns," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 111-132, March.
    2. Nadezhda Shmeleva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Olga Dudareva, 2023. "Integration as a Driver of Enterprise Sustainability: The Russian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Richard Volkert & Jerrell Stracener & Junfang Yu, 2014. "Incorporating a Measure of Uncertainty into Systems of Systems Development Performance Measures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 297-312, September.
    4. Takehiro Inohara & Keith W. Hipel, 2008. "Coalition analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 343-359, December.
    5. Flavio Oquendo, 2019. "Architecting exogenous software‐intensive systems‐of‐systems on the internet‐of‐vehicles with SosADL," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(6), pages 502-518, November.
    6. Mohsen Mosleh & Peter Ludlow & Babak Heydari, 2016. "Distributed Resource Management in Systems of Systems: An Architecture Perspective," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 362-374, July.
    7. Yacov Y. Haimes & Barry M. Horowitz & Zhenyu Guo & Eva Andrijcic & Joshua Bogdanor, 2015. "Assessing Systemic Risk to Cloud‐Computing Technology as Complex Interconnected Systems of Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 284-299, May.
    8. Jo Ann Lane & Barry Boehm, 2008. "System of systems lead system integrators: Where Do they spend their time and what makes them more or less efficient?," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 81-91, March.
    9. Alessandro Aliakbargolkar & Edward F. Crawley, 2013. "Architecting methodology for spatially and temporally distributed resource extraction systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 277-286, September.
    10. Jo Ann Lane & Tim Bohn, 2013. "Using SysML modeling to understand and evolve systems of systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 87-98, March.
    11. Bernard Collins & Steven Doskey & James Moreland, 2017. "Modeling the Convergence of Collaborative Systems of Systems: A Quantitative Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 357-378, July.
    12. Ali A. Yassine & Luke A. Wissmann, 2007. "The Implications of Product Architecture on the Firm," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 118-137, June.
    13. Miri Sitton & Yoram Reich, 2015. "Enterprise Systems Engineering for Better Operational Interoperability," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 625-638, November.
    14. Sarah A Sheard & Ali Mostashari, 2009. "Principles of complex systems for systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 295-311, December.
    15. Dov Dvir & Aaron J. Shenhar & Shlomo Alkaher, 2003. "From a single discipline product to a multidisciplinary system: Adapting the right style to the right project," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 123-134.
    16. Paul T. Grogan & Sebastiaan A. Meijer, 2017. "Gaming Methods in Engineering Systems Research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 542-552, November.
    17. Michael J. Pennock & William B. Rouse, 2016. "The Epistemology of Enterprises," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 24-43, January.
    18. Liwång, Hans, 2022. "Defense development: The role of co-creation in filling the gap between policy-makers and technology development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Knapen, Rob & Lokers, Rob & Janssen, Sander, 2023. "Evaluating the D4Science virtual research environment platform for agro-climatic research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. Joseph Z. Ben‐Asher, 2004. "Systems engineering aspects in theatre missile defense—design principles and a case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 186-194.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:77-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.