IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v17y2014i1p10-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging Variability Modeling Techniques for Architecture Trade Studies and Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Ryan
  • Shahram Sarkani
  • Thomas Mazzuchi

Abstract

Increasing complexity in modern systems, as well as cost and schedule constraints, require a new paradigm of Systems Engineering to fulfill stakeholder needs. Challenges facing efficient trade studies include poor tool interoperability, lack of simulation coordination (design parameters), and requirements flow down. A recent trend toward Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) includes flexible architecture definition, program documentation, requirements traceability, and Systems Engineering reuse. As a rapidly evolving practice, MBSE still lacks governing standards and commonly accepted frameworks. This paper proposes a framework for efficient architecture definition using MBSE in conjunction with domain specific simulation to evaluate alternatives. Variant modeling techniques are introduced as an extension to capturing parameterized architecture options. Initial exploration applies such variant modeling techniques to design for adaptability trade study criteria, as a means to evaluate candidate architecture configurations against multiple requirement sets. A general framework is provided, followed with a specific example including a method for designing a trade study, defining candidate architectures, planning simulations to fulfill requirements, and designing a weighted decision analysis to optimize system objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Ryan & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi, 2014. "Leveraging Variability Modeling Techniques for Architecture Trade Studies and Analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 10-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:10-25
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21247
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey O. Grady, 2009. "Universal Architecture Description Framework," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(2), pages 91-116, June.
    2. Ingmar Ögren, 2000. "Possible tailoring of the UML for systems engineering purposes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(4), pages 212-224.
    3. Avner Engel & Tyson R. Browning, 2008. "Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 125-146, June.
    4. A. Terry Bahill & Ferenc Szidarovszky, 2009. "Comparison of dynamic system modeling methods," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 183-200, September.
    5. Yariv Grobshtein & Dov Dori, 2011. "Generating SysML views from an OPM model: Design and evaluation," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 327-340, September.
    6. Henric Andersson & Erik Herzog & Gert Johansson & Olof Johansson, 2010. "Experience from introducing Unified Modeling Language/Systems Modeling Language at Saab Aerosystems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 369-380, December.
    7. Johanna Bragge & Pekka Korhonen & Hannele Wallenius & Jyrki Wallenius, 2010. "Bibliometric Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Making/Multiattribute Utility Theory," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Matthias Ehrgott & Boris Naujoks & Theodor J. Stewart & Jyrki Wallenius (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems, pages 259-268, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro Salado, 2015. "Defining Better Test Strategies with Tradespace Exploration Techniques and Pareto Fronts: Application in an Industrial Project," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 639-658, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Durugbo, 2013. "Integrated product‐service analysis using SysML requirement diagrams," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 111-123, March.
    2. Terry Bahill & Jesse Daniels, 2003. "Using objected‐oriented and UML tools for hardware design: A case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 28-48.
    3. Tyson R. Browning & Eric C. Honour, 2008. "Measuring the life‐cycle value of enduring systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 187-202, September.
    4. Eun Suk Suh & Michael R. Furst & Kenneth J. Mihalyov & Olivier de Weck, 2010. "Technology infusion for complex systems: A framework and case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 186-203, June.
    5. Alberto Sols & Javier Romero & Robert Cloutier, 2012. "Performance‐based logistics and technology refreshment programs: Bridging the operational‐life performance capability gap in the Spanish F‐100 frigates," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 422-432, December.
    6. Alessandro Golkar & Edward F. Crawley, 2014. "A Framework for Space Systems Architecture under Stakeholder Objectives Ambiguity," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 479-502, December.
    7. Atiogbe Didier Koffi, 2005. "A model for the evolution of software and systems engineering project cultures throughout their life cycles," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 151-163.
    8. Josef Frysak & Edward W. N. Bernroider & Konradin Maier, 2017. "An Effort Feedback Perspective on Persuasive Decision Aids for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 161-181, January.
    9. Benedict Bender & Clementine Bertheau & Tim Körppen & Hannah Lauppe & Norbert Gronau, 2022. "A proposal for future data organization in enterprise systems—an analysis of established database approaches," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 441-494, September.
    10. Sungchul Kim & Ronald Giachetti & Sangsung Park, 2018. "Real Options Analysis for Acquisition of New Technology: A Case Study of Korea K2 Tank’s Powerpack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Michel‐Alexandre Cardin & Mehdi Ranjbar‐Bourani & Richard de Neufville, 2015. "Improving the Lifecycle Performance of Engineering Projects with Flexible Strategies: Example of On‐Shore LNG Production Design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 253-268, May.
    12. Oluwatomi Adetunji & John Bischoff & Christopher J. Willy, 2018. "Managing system obsolescence via multicriteria decision making," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 307-321, July.
    13. Pereira, Miguel Alves & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2022. "Is sunshine regulation the new prescription to brighten up public hospitals in Portugal?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. Eun Suk Suh & Noemi Chiriac & Katja Hölttä‐Otto, 2015. "Seeing Complex System through Different Lenses: Impact of Decomposition Perspective on System Architecture Analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 229-240, May.
    15. Jan-jaap Moerman & Seppe van Heusden & Brigitte Matheussen & Alberto Martinetti, 2022. "Encouraging a Modal Shift to Passenger Railway Transportation: A Case Study in Adaptable Rolling Stock Interior Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Ward, E. John & Dimitriou, Harry T. & Dean, Marco, 2016. "Theory and background of multi-criteria analysis: Toward a policy-led approach to mega transport infrastructure project appraisal," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 21-45.
    17. Avner Engel & Yoram Reich, 2015. "Advancing Architecture Options Theory: Six Industrial Case Studies," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 396-414, July.
    18. Daniel Kasperek & Daniel Schenk & Matthias Kreimeyer & Maik Maurer & Udo Lindemann, 2016. "Structure‐Based System Dynamics Analysis of Engineering Design Processes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 278-298, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:10-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.