IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v22y2014i2p95-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Development and the Rehabilitation of a Historic Urban District – Social Sustainability in the Case of Tianzifang in Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Hiu Kwan Yung
  • Edwin Hon Wan Chan
  • Ying Xu

Abstract

ABSTRACT Conservation of historic buildings and streets through rehabilitation is growing rapidly in many countries. The extent to which this approach is conducive to the aims of social sustainability has yet to be investigated. This study examines the attributes and factors that contribute to socially sustainable development in the rehabilitation of historic districts. A historic district in Shanghai, China, is used as a case study. The study area, Tianzifang, is a community‐initiated rehabilitation, which has conserved traditional residential houses and old factories and transformed them into a community for creative industry. Site observations, personal interviews and questionnaire surveys of public opinion were conducted to examine the contributing factors. Through a literature review, fieldwork and a pilot study, 21 factors were identified as contributing social sustainability to the rehabilitation of historic districts and form the basis of the analysis of the case study and the opinion survey exercise. Through factor analysis, the underlying social sustainability factors that embrace the 21 attributes were derived. In order of importance, the social sustainability factors are ‘Maintain good physical condition to fulfill educational role’, ‘Provide public involvement opportunities’, ‘Enhance sense of place and local culture’, ‘Enhance cultural identity and collective memory’ and ‘Retain significant meanings and associations to the community’. This study presents a framework to understand the underlying factors for socially sustainable rehabilitation of historic districts, which provides insights for professionals and communities to design and implement rehabilitation strategies. The framework also provides a reference to examine other complex heritage sites worldwide. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Hiu Kwan Yung & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Ying Xu, 2014. "Sustainable Development and the Rehabilitation of a Historic Urban District – Social Sustainability in the Case of Tianzifang in Shanghai," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 95-112, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:22:y:2014:i:2:p:95-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taozhi Zhuang & Queena K. Qian & Henk J. Visscher & Marja G. Elsinga, 2017. "Stakeholders’ Expectations in Urban Renewal Projects in China: A Key Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Xiaohua Zhong & Ho Hon Leung, 2019. "Exploring Participatory Microregeneration as Sustainable Renewal of Built Heritage Community: Two Case Studies in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Tianren Yang & Minghai Ye & Pei Pei & Yongjiang Shi & Haozhi Pan, 2019. "City Branding Evaluation as a Tool for Sustainable Urban Growth: A Framework and Lessons from the Yangtze River Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Marioara Pascu & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu, 2021. "The Assessment of the Authenticity and Conservation Status of Cultural Landscapes in Southern Transylvania (Romania)," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Wang, Xiaoxiao & Shi, Ruiting & Zhou, Ying, 2020. "Dynamics of urban sprawl and sustainable development in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Nan Guo & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Esther Hiu Kwan Yung, 2020. "Alternative Governance Model for Historical Building Conservation in China: From Property Rights Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Non Arkaraprasertkul, 2018. "Gentrification and its contentment: An anthropological perspective on housing, heritage and urban social change in Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1561-1578, May.
    8. Le Yu & Binglei Xie & Edwin H. W. Chan, 2018. "How does the Built Environment Influence Public Transit Choice in Urban Villages in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Tulin Vural Arslan & Selen Durak & Deniz Ozge Aytac, 2016. "Attaining SDG11: can sustainability assessment tools be used for improved transformation of neighbourhoods in historic city centers?," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(4), pages 180-202, November.
    10. Craig Langston & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung, 2018. "Hybrid Input-Output Analysis of Embodied Carbon and Construction Cost Differences between New-Build and Refurbished Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Tingjun Li & Qingxiang Li, 2024. "Virtual Reality in Historic Urban District Renovation for Enhancing Social and Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Tangzixiang in Anhui," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Qi Zhang & Esther Hiu-Kwan Yung & Edwin Hon-Wan Chan, 2021. "Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-32, November.
    13. Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2019. "What Is the Critical Factor and Relationship of Urban Regeneration in a Historic District?: A Case of the Nanluoguxiang Area in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:22:y:2014:i:2:p:95-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.