IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v22y2002i2p203-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Overview of the Salmonella Enteritidis Risk Assessment for Shell Eggs and Egg Products

Author

Listed:
  • B. K. Hope
  • A. R. Baker
  • E. D. Edel
  • A. T. Hogue
  • W. D. Schlosser
  • R. Whiting
  • R. M. McDowell
  • R. A. Morales

Abstract

This article summarizes a quantitative microbial risk assessment designed to characterize the public health impact of consumption of shell eggs and egg products contaminated with Salmonella Enteritidis (SE). This risk assessment's objectives were to: (1) establish the baseline risk of foodborne illness from SE, (2) identify and evaluate potential risk mitigation strategies, and (3) identify data gaps related to future research efforts. The risk assessment model has five modules. The Egg Production module estimates the number of eggs produced that are SE‐contaminated. Shell Egg Processing, Egg Products Processing, and Preparation & Consumption modules estimate the increase or decrease in the numbers of SE organisms in eggs or egg products as they pass through storage, transportation, processing, and preparation. A Public Health Outcomes module then calculates the incidence of illnesses and four clinical outcomes, as well as the cases of reactive arthritis associated with SE infection following consumption. The baseline model estimates an average production of 2.3 million SE‐contaminated shell eggs/year of the estimated 69 billion produced annually and predicts an average of 661,633, human illnesses per year from consumption of these eggs. The model estimates ≈ 94% of these cases recover without medical care, 5% visit a physician, an additional 0.5% are hospitalized, and 0.05% result in death. The contribution of SE from commercially pasteurized egg products was estimated to be negligible. Five mitigation scenarios were selected for comparison of their individual and combined effects on the number of human illnesses. Results suggest that mitigation in only one segment of the farm‐to‐table continuum will be less effective than several applied in different segments. Key data gaps and areas for future research include the epidemiology of SE on farms, the bacteriology of SE in eggs, human behavior in food handling and preparation, and human responses to SE exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • B. K. Hope & A. R. Baker & E. D. Edel & A. T. Hogue & W. D. Schlosser & R. Whiting & R. M. McDowell & R. A. Morales, 2002. "An Overview of the Salmonella Enteritidis Risk Assessment for Shell Eggs and Egg Products," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 203-218, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:22:y:2002:i:2:p:203-218
    DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.00023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0272-4332.00023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Miconnet & Marie Cornu & Annie Beaufort & Laurent Rosso & Jean‐Baptiste Denis, 2005. "Uncertainty Distribution Associated with Estimating a Proportion in Microbial Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 39-48, February.
    2. Dominic Mancini & Gregmar I. Galinato, 2008. "Was It Something I Ate? Implementation of the FDA Seafood HACCP Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(1), pages 28-41.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:22:y:2002:i:2:p:203-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.