IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v22y2020i4p1065-1075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of the biopsychosocial functional activity program on cognitive function for community older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A cluster‐randomized controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Yen‐Chun Lin
  • Chi‐Jane Wang
  • Yin‐Fan Chang
  • Jing‐Jy Wang

Abstract

Early preventive interventions may delay the onset of dementia for people with mild cognitive impairment. This study was designed to examine the effects of the biopsychosocial functional activity program on the cognitive function of community middle to older adults with mild cognitive impairment. A cluster‐randomized controlled trial was conducted. The experimental group received a 12‐month biopsychosocial functional activity program intervention that contained two phases. The first phase was a 6‐week teaching program followed by a second‐phase home follow‐up phase. The measurement was carried out at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after the biopsychosocial functional activity program. The measurement tool was the Chinese version of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination. The Generalized Estimating Equations statistical approach was used to analyze the data. The experimental group showed significant short‐term and continuous improvement in overall cognitive function in the immediate‐ and short‐term memory domain while the domain of attention and executive function showed improvement on the 12‐month measurement compared to the control group. Yet, there was no significant improvement overall and in the three domains of cognitive function for the control group. The findings may become references for advancing the dementia prevention program for communities as well as the national policies for dementia prevention programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yen‐Chun Lin & Chi‐Jane Wang & Yin‐Fan Chang & Jing‐Jy Wang, 2020. "Effects of the biopsychosocial functional activity program on cognitive function for community older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A cluster‐randomized controlled trial," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1065-1075, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:4:p:1065-1075
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12772
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wido G. M. Oerlemans & Arnold B. Bakker & Ruut Veenhoven, 2011. "Finding the Key to Happy Aging: A Day Reconstruction Study of Happiness," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(6), pages 665-674.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Steven Marcum, 2011. "Age Differences in Daily Social Activities," Working Papers WR-904, RAND Corporation.
    2. Dave Möwisch & Florian Schmiedek & David Richter & Annette Brose, 2019. "Capturing Affective Well-Being in Daily Life with the Day Reconstruction Method: A Refined View on Positive and Negative Affect," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 641-663, February.
    3. Paul Dolan & Laura Kudrna & Arthur Stone, 2017. "The Measure Matters: An Investigation of Evaluative and Experience-Based Measures of Wellbeing in Time Use Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 57-73, October.
    4. Sofia Humboldt & Isabel Leal & Filipa Pimenta & João Maroco, 2014. "Assessing Adjustment to Aging: A Validation Study for the Adjustment to Aging Scale (AtAS)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 455-472, October.
    5. Carmen Requena & George W. Rebok, 2019. "Evaluating Successful Aging in Older People Who Participated in Computerized or Paper-and-Pencil Memory Training: The Memoria Mejor Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Daniel W L Lai & Nan Qin, 2018. "Extraversion personality, perceived health and activity participation among community-dwelling aging adults in Hong Kong," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Ivana Anusic & Richard E. Lucas & M. Brent Donnellan, 2017. "The Validity of the Day Reconstruction Method in the German Socio-economic Panel Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 213-232, January.
    8. Sofia Humboldt & Francis Carneiro & Isabel Leal, 2019. "A Structural Model for Adjustment to Aging among Older Women in Breast Cancer Remission," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 441-459, April.
    9. Maja Tadic & Wido Oerlemans & Arnold Bakker & Ruut Veenhoven, 2013. "Daily Activities and Happiness in Later Life: The Role of Work Status," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1507-1527, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:4:p:1065-1075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.