IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v66by2011i6p665-674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding the Key to Happy Aging: A Day Reconstruction Study of Happiness

Author

Listed:
  • Wido G. M. Oerlemans
  • Arnold B. Bakker
  • Ruut Veenhoven

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Wido G. M. Oerlemans & Arnold B. Bakker & Ruut Veenhoven, 2011. "Finding the Key to Happy Aging: A Day Reconstruction Study of Happiness," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(6), pages 665-674.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:66b:y:2011:i:6:p:665-674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbr040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivana Anusic & Richard E. Lucas & M. Brent Donnellan, 2017. "The Validity of the Day Reconstruction Method in the German Socio-economic Panel Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 213-232, January.
    2. Paul Dolan & Laura Kudrna & Arthur Stone, 2017. "The Measure Matters: An Investigation of Evaluative and Experience-Based Measures of Wellbeing in Time Use Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 57-73, October.
    3. Christopher Steven Marcum, 2011. "Age Differences in Daily Social Activities," Working Papers WR-904, RAND Corporation.
    4. Daniel W L Lai & Nan Qin, 2018. "Extraversion personality, perceived health and activity participation among community-dwelling aging adults in Hong Kong," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Dave Möwisch & Florian Schmiedek & David Richter & Annette Brose, 2019. "Capturing Affective Well-Being in Daily Life with the Day Reconstruction Method: A Refined View on Positive and Negative Affect," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 641-663, February.
    6. Maja Tadic & Wido Oerlemans & Arnold Bakker & Ruut Veenhoven, 2013. "Daily Activities and Happiness in Later Life: The Role of Work Status," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1507-1527, October.
    7. Yen‐Chun Lin & Chi‐Jane Wang & Yin‐Fan Chang & Jing‐Jy Wang, 2020. "Effects of the biopsychosocial functional activity program on cognitive function for community older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A cluster‐randomized controlled trial," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1065-1075, December.
    8. Sofia Humboldt & Francis Carneiro & Isabel Leal, 2019. "A Structural Model for Adjustment to Aging among Older Women in Breast Cancer Remission," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 441-459, April.
    9. Sofia Humboldt & Isabel Leal & Filipa Pimenta & João Maroco, 2014. "Assessing Adjustment to Aging: A Validation Study for the Adjustment to Aging Scale (AtAS)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 455-472, October.
    10. Carmen Requena & George W. Rebok, 2019. "Evaluating Successful Aging in Older People Who Participated in Computerized or Paper-and-Pencil Memory Training: The Memoria Mejor Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:66b:y:2011:i:6:p:665-674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.