IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v35y1988i5p373-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal inspection under semi‐markovian deterioration: Basic results

Author

Listed:
  • Armando Z. Milioni
  • Stanley R. Pliska

Abstract

This article develops a model for determining the optimal inspection schedule for a system which deteriorates according to a semi‐Markov process that progresses through three states: good, defective, and bad. A binary test is used, and false positives may occur. A true positive results in an action that reduces the likelihood of entering the bad state, but at most one such corrective action can occur during the lifetime of the system. Costs are associated with each inspection, each false positive, the corrective action, and the entrance into the bad state. Dynamic programming is used to compute the minimum expected cost, which is a function of the age of the system. The optimal inspection schedule is readily derived from this value function. Computational examples are provided. This model is appropriate for medical screening or for a mission where there is only one spare part.

Suggested Citation

  • Armando Z. Milioni & Stanley R. Pliska, 1988. "Optimal inspection under semi‐markovian deterioration: Basic results," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 373-392, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:35:y:1988:i:5:p:373-392
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(198810)35:53.0.CO;2-W
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(198810)35:53.0.CO;2-W
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(198810)35:53.0.CO;2-W?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald Rosenfield, 1976. "Markovian Deterioration with Uncertain Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 141-155, February.
    2. S. Christian Albright, 1979. "Structural Results for Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1041-1053, October.
    3. Richard D. Smallwood & Edward J. Sondik, 1973. "The Optimal Control of Partially Observable Markov Processes over a Finite Horizon," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 1071-1088, October.
    4. Donald Rosenfield, 1976. "Markovian Deterioration With Uncertain Information — A More General Model," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 389-405, September.
    5. Chelsea C. White, 1977. "A Markov Quality Control Process Subject to Partial Observation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(8), pages 843-852, April.
    6. George E. Monahan, 1982. "State of the Art---A Survey of Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes: Theory, Models, and Algorithms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Edward J. Sondik, 1978. "The Optimal Control of Partially Observable Markov Processes over the Infinite Horizon: Discounted Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 282-304, April.
    8. S. Christian Albright, 1980. "Optimal maintenance‐repair policies for the machine repair problem," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 17-27, March.
    9. Y. S. Sherif & M. L. Smith, 1981. "Optimal maintenance models for systems subject to failure–A Review," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 47-74, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiel van Oosterom & Lisa M. Maillart & Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh, 2017. "Optimal maintenance policies for a safety‐critical system and its deteriorating sensor," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(5), pages 399-417, August.
    2. Hao Zhang & Weihua Zhang, 2023. "Analytical Solution to a Partially Observable Machine Maintenance Problem with Obvious Failures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3993-4015, July.
    3. Hao Zhang, 2010. "Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes: A Geometric Technique and Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 214-228, February.
    4. Wallace J. Hopp & Sung‐Chi Wu, 1988. "Multiaction maintenance under markovian deterioration and incomplete state information," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(5), pages 447-462, October.
    5. Gong, Linguo & Tang, Kwei, 1997. "Monitoring machine operations using on-line sensors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 479-492, February.
    6. V. Makis & X. Jiang, 2003. "Optimal Replacement Under Partial Observations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 382-394, May.
    7. Jue Wang & Chi-Guhn Lee, 2015. "Multistate Bayesian Control Chart Over a Finite Horizon," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 949-964, August.
    8. Stephen M. Gilbert & Hena M Bar, 1999. "The value of observing the condition of a deteriorating machine," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(7), pages 790-808, October.
    9. Wooseung Jang & J. George Shanthikumar, 2002. "Stochastic allocation of inspection capacity to competitive processes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(1), pages 78-94, February.
    10. Williams, Byron K., 2009. "Markov decision processes in natural resources management: Observability and uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(6), pages 830-840.
    11. Yanling Chang & Alan Erera & Chelsea White, 2015. "Value of information for a leader–follower partially observed Markov game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 129-153, December.
    12. Junbo Son & Yeongin Kim & Shiyu Zhou, 2022. "Alerting patients via health information system considering trust-dependent patient adherence," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 245-269, December.
    13. Yanling Chang & Alan Erera & Chelsea White, 2015. "A leader–follower partially observed, multiobjective Markov game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 103-128, December.
    14. Jue Wang, 2016. "Minimizing the false alarm rate in systems with transient abnormality," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(4), pages 320-334, June.
    15. Chernonog, Tatyana & Avinadav, Tal, 2016. "A two-state partially observable Markov decision process with three actionsAuthor-Name: Ben-Zvi, Tal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 957-967.
    16. Saghafian, Soroush, 2018. "Ambiguous partially observable Markov decision processes: Structural results and applications," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1-35.
    17. Williams, Byron K., 2011. "Resolving structural uncertainty in natural resources management using POMDP approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(5), pages 1092-1102.
    18. Deep, Akash & Zhou, Shiyu & Veeramani, Dharmaraj & Chen, Yong, 2023. "Partially observable Markov decision process-based optimal maintenance planning with time-dependent observations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 533-544.
    19. Givon, Moshe & Grosfeld-Nir, Abraham, 2008. "Using partially observed Markov processes to select optimal termination time of TV shows," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 477-485, June.
    20. Miehling, Erik & Teneketzis, Demosthenis, 2020. "Monotonicity properties for two-action partially observable Markov decision processes on partially ordered spaces," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 936-944.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:35:y:1988:i:5:p:373-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.