IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i5-6p701-711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Newly graduated nurses’ socialisation resulting in limiting inquiry and one‐sided use of knowledge sources—An ethnographic study

Author

Listed:
  • Siri Lygum Voldbjerg
  • Rick Wiechula
  • Erik Elgaard Sørensen
  • Mette Grønkjær

Abstract

Aim To explore how the socialisation into the clinical setting and interaction between newly graduated nurses and experienced nurses influences the new graduates’ use of knowledge sources. Background Newly graduated nurses’ use of knowledge sources in decision‐making has been subject to an increased interest in relation to evidence‐based practice. Despite interventions to strengthen nurses’ competencies required for making reflective clinical decisions within an evidence‐based practice, studies highlight that new graduates only draw on knowledge from research, patients and other components within evidence‐based practice to a limited extent. Research exploring new graduates’ use of knowledge sources calls attention to the experienced nurses’ decisive role as a valued knowledge source. The new graduates’ process of socialisation and their interaction with the experienced nurse raises further questions. Methods Ethnography using participant‐observation and individual semi‐structured interviews of nine newly graduated nurses from a University Hospital in Denmark. Data were collected in 2014. The study adheres to COREQ. Results Two main structures were found: “Striving for acknowledgment” and “Unintentionally suppressed inquiry.” Conclusions New graduates are socialised into limiting their inquiry on clinical practice and unintentionally being restricted to using the experienced nurse as predominant knowledge source. Depending on how the experienced nurse responds to the role as predominant knowledge source, they could either limit or nurture the new graduates’ inquiry into practice and thus the variety of knowledge sources used in clinical decision‐making. Limited inquiry into the complexity of nursing practice indirectly excludes the use of a variety of knowledge sources, which are fundamental to an evidence‐based practice. Relevance If clinical practice wishes to benefit from the newly graduated nurses’ inquiring approach and skills within evidence‐based practice, clinical practice will have to greet the nurses with a supportive culture where questioning practice is seen as a strength rather than a sign of insecurity and incompetence.

Suggested Citation

  • Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær, 2021. "Newly graduated nurses’ socialisation resulting in limiting inquiry and one‐sided use of knowledge sources—An ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 701-711, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:701-711
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15592
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rung‐Fen Feng & Yun‐Fang Tsai, 2012. "Socialisation of new graduate nurses to practising nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(13-14), pages 2064-2071, July.
    2. Dorothy Horsburgh & Janis Ross, 2013. "Care and compassion: the experiences of newly qualified staff nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(7-8), pages 1124-1132, April.
    3. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Mette Grønkjær & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2017. "Newly graduated nurses’ use of knowledge sources in clinical decision‐making: an ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1313-1327, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Mette Grønkjær & Rick Wiechula & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2017. "Newly graduated nurses’ use of knowledge sources in clinical decision‐making: an ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1313-1327, May.
    2. Andrea McCloughen & David Levy & Anya Johnson & Helena Nguyen & Heather McKenzie, 2020. "Nursing students’ socialisation to emotion management during early clinical placement experiences: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2508-2520, July.
    3. Min Zhang & Li Ge & Mikael Rask, 2019. "Cross‐cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Verbal and Social Interaction Questionnaire: A cross‐sectional study among nursing students in China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2181-2196, June.
    4. Trundle, Catherine & Phillips, Tarryn, 2023. "Defining focused ethnography: Disciplinary boundary-work and the imagined divisions between ‘focused’ and ‘traditional’ ethnography in health research – A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    5. David Pérez-Jorge & María del Carmen Rodríguez-Jiménez & Eva Ariño-Mateo & Fernando Barragán-Medero, 2020. "The Effect of COVID-19 in University Tutoring Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Kim Usher & Jane Mills & Caryn West & Tanya Park & Cindy Woods, 2015. "Preregistration student nurses' self‐reported preparedness for practice before and after the introduction of a capstone subject," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3245-3254, November.
    7. Jacinta Kelly, 2014. "Commentary on Horsburgh D and Ross J (2013) Care and compassion: experiences of newly qualified staff nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing 22, 1124–1132," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2382-2383, August.
    8. Pavneet Singh & Shelley Raffin‐Bouchal & Susan McClement & Thomas F Hack & Kelli Stajduhar & Neil A Hagen & Aynharan Sinnarajah & Harvey M Chochinov & Shane Sinclair, 2018. "Healthcare providers’ perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators of compassion: Results from a grounded theory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2083-2097, May.
    9. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Karen Lyng Larsen & Gitte Nielsen & Britt Laugesen, 2020. "Exploring nursing students’ use of the Fundamentals of Care framework in case‐based work," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1968-1980, June.
    10. Viviana Davalos-Batallas & Ana-Magdalena Vargas-Martínez & Patricia Bonilla-Sierra & Fatima Leon-Larios & Maria-de-las-Mercedes Lomas-Campos & Silvia-Libertad Vaca-Gallegos & Rocio de Diego-Cordero, 2020. "Compassionate Engagement and Action in the Education for Health Care Professions: A Cross-Sectional Study at an Ecuadorian University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Graham McCaffrey & Shelagh McConnell, 2015. "Compassion: a critical review of peer‐reviewed nursing literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 3006-3015, October.
    12. Hafidza Baharum & Aniza Ismail & Zainudin Awang & Lisa McKenna & Roszita Ibrahim & Zainah Mohamed & Nor Haty Hassan, 2023. "Validating an Instrument for Measuring Newly Graduated Nurses’ Adaptation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Mohit Yadav & Santosh Rangnekar, 2016. "Role Clarity and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Does Tenure Matter? A Study on Indian Power Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3_suppl), pages 207-224, June.
    14. Paul Crawford & Brian Brown & Marit Kvangarsnes & Paul Gilbert, 2014. "The design of compassionate care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3589-3599, December.
    15. Joanne Durkin & Kim Usher & Debra Jackson, 2019. "Embodying compassion: A systematic review of the views of nurses and patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1380-1392, May.
    16. Siri Lygum Voldbjerg & Britt Laugesen & Iben Bøgh Bahnsen & Lone Jørgensen & Ingrid Maria Sørensen & Mette Grønkjær & Erik Elgaard Sørensen, 2018. "Integrating the fundamentals of care framework in baccalaureate nursing education: An example from a nursing school in Denmark," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2506-2515, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:701-711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.