IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i7-8p1267-1275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The introduction of a safety checklist in two UK hospital emergency departments: A qualitative study of implementation and staff use

Author

Listed:
  • Tracey Stone
  • Jon Banks
  • Heather Brant
  • Joanna Kesten
  • Emma Redfern
  • Ann Remmers
  • Sabi Redwood

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the extent to which a checklist designed to support patient safety in hospital Emergency Departments was recognised and used by staff. Background Patient crowding in UK Emergency Departments makes it difficult for staff to monitor all patients for signs of clinical deterioration. An Emergency Department Safety Checklist was developed at a UK hospital to ensure patients are regularly monitored. It was subsequently implemented in six hospitals and recommended for use across the National Health Service in England. Methods This was a qualitative study in two UK hospital Emergency Departments. Data collection consisted of sixty‐six hours of nonparticipant observation and interviews with twenty‐six staff. Observations were sampled across different days and times. Interviews sampled a range of staff. Data were analysed thematically. The study was undertaken in accordance with COREQ guidelines. Results Staff described the Emergency Department Safety Checklist as a useful prompt and reminder for monitoring patients' vital signs and other aspects of care. It was also reported as effective in communicating patient care status to other staff. However, completing the checklist was also described as a task which could be overlooked during busy periods. During implementation, the checklist was promoted to staff in ways that obscured its core function of maintaining patient safety. Conclusions The Emergency Department Safety Checklist can support staff in maintaining patient safety. However, it was not fully recognised by staff as a core component of everyday clinical practice. Relevance to clinical practice The Emergency Department Safety Checklist is a response to an overcrowded environment. To realise the potential of the checklist, emergency departments should take the following steps during implementation: (a) focus on the core function of clinical safety, (b) fully integrate the checklist into the existing workflow and (c) employ a departmental team‐based approach to implementation and training.

Suggested Citation

  • Tracey Stone & Jon Banks & Heather Brant & Joanna Kesten & Emma Redfern & Ann Remmers & Sabi Redwood, 2020. "The introduction of a safety checklist in two UK hospital emergency departments: A qualitative study of implementation and staff use," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1267-1275, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1267-1275
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15184
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimberly D Johnson & Lindsey Mueller & Chris Winkelman, 2017. "The nurse response to abnormal vital sign recording in the emergency department," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 148-156, January.
    2. Angela Christiansen & Linda Coventry & Renée Graham & Elisabeth Jacob & Di Twigg & Lisa Whitehead, 2018. "Intentional rounding in acute adult healthcare settings: A systematic mixed‐method review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1759-1792, May.
    3. Boreham, N. C. & Shea, C. E. & Mackway-Jones, K., 2000. "Clinical risk and collective competence in the hospital emergency department in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 83-91, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Spångfors & Gitte Bunkenborg & Mats Molt & Karin Samuelson, 2019. "The National Early Warning Score predicts mortality in hospital ward patients with deviating vital signs: A retrospective medical record review study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1216-1222, April.
    2. Valentina Nino & David Claudio & Christie Schiel & Brendan Bellows, 2020. "Coupling Wearable Devices and Decision Theory in the United States Emergency Department Triage Process: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Iedema, Rick, 2009. "New approaches to researching patient safety," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 1701-1704, December.
    4. Jørghild Karlotte Jensen & Randi Skår & Bodil Tveit, 2019. "Hospital nurses' professional accountability while using the National Early Warning Score: A qualitative study with a hermeneutic design," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4389-4399, December.
    5. Grant, Suzanne & Guthrie, Bruce, 2018. "Between demarcation and discretion: The medical-administrative boundary as a locus of safety in high-volume organisational routines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 43-50.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1267-1275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.