IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4227-4238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subordinated masculinities: A critical inquiry into reproduction of gender norms in handovers and rounds in a forensic psychiatric care

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Eivergård
  • Ingela Enmarker
  • Mona Livholts
  • Lena Aléx
  • Ove Hellzén

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine how gendered discursive norms and notions of masculinity are (re)produced in professional conversations about men cared for as patients in forensic psychiatric care, with a particular focus on the centrality of language and gender. Background During verbal handovers and ward rounds, care staff converse to share information about patients and make decisions about their mental status. Spoken language is thus a pivotal tool in verbal handovers and ward rounds, one able to reproduce discourses and gender norms. Design Qualitative. Data collected from audio recordings of verbal handovers and ward rounds in a forensic psychiatric clinic were subjected to discourse analysis. The COREQ checklist was used. Results While discussing patients, staff subordinated them by reproducing a discourse typical of heteronormative, family‐oriented care. The overarching discourse, which we labelled subordinated masculinities, was supported by three other discourses: being unable to take responsibility, being drug‐addicted and performing masculinity. Such discourse was identified as a disciplining practice that subordinate's patients as a means to maintain order, rules and gender norms. Conclusion The study reveals a caring practice that position male patients as children or disabled individuals and, in that way, as subordinated other men within a context were staff reproduces a heteronormative family structured care. The process also reveals a practice were downplaying aggressive and deviant behaviour could disempower and reduce patients´ responsibility for personal actions and their possibilities to participate in their care. That finding especially seems to contradict previous findings that patients want to be able to act responsibly and, to that end, want care staff to help them. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses need to deepen their understanding of how language (re)produces discursive norms of gender and masculinity in forensic care and that process's consequences for such care.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Eivergård & Ingela Enmarker & Mona Livholts & Lena Aléx & Ove Hellzén, 2020. "Subordinated masculinities: A critical inquiry into reproduction of gender norms in handovers and rounds in a forensic psychiatric care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4227-4238, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4227-4238
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15456
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenelle Matic & Patricia M Davidson & Yenna Salamonson, 2011. "Review: bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerisation during clinical handover," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1‐2), pages 184-189, January.
    2. Verbeke, Evi & Vanheule, Stijn & Cauwe, Joachim & Truijens, Femke & Froyen, Brenda, 2019. "Coercion and power in psychiatry: A qualitative study with ex-patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 89-96.
    3. Niels Buus & Bente Hoeck & Bridget Elizabeth Hamilton, 2017. "Nurses’ shift reports: a systematic literature search and critical review of qualitative field studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2891-2906, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian‐Guo Yang & Jun Zhang, 2016. "Improving the postoperative handover process in the intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1062-1072, April.
    2. Martin Salzmann-Erikson & Lilly Yifter, 2020. "Risk Factors and Triggers That May Result in Patient-Initiated Violence on Inpatient Psychiatric Units: An Integrative Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(7), pages 504-520, September.
    3. Maree Johnson & Paula Sanchez & Catherine Zheng, 2016. "The impact of an integrated nursing handover system on nurses' satisfaction and work practices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    4. Beverly O'Connell & Cherene Ockerby & Mary Hawkins, 2014. "Construct validity and reliability of the Handover Evaluation Scale," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3-4), pages 560-570, February.
    5. Katherine M Ernst & Sara A McComb & Cathaleen Ley, 2018. "Nurse‐to‐nurse shift handoffs on medical–surgical units: A process within the flow of nursing care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1189-1201, March.
    6. Merete Lyngstad & Anders Grimsmo & Dag Hofoss & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2014. "Home care nurses' experiences with using electronic messaging in their communication with general practitioners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3424-3433, December.
    7. Martin Salzmann‐Erikson, 2018. "Using focused ethnography to explore and describe the process of nurses’ shift reports in a psychiatric intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3104-3114, August.
    8. Martínez-Hernáez, Ángel & Pié-Balaguer, Asun & Serrano-Miguel, Mercedes & Morales-Sáez, Nicolás & García-Santesmases, Andrea & Bekele, Deborah & Alegre-Agís, Elisa, 2020. "The collaborative management of antipsychotic medication and its obstacles: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4227-4238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.