IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i19-20p3870-3881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Riding an elephant: A qualitative study of nurses' moral journeys in the context of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD)

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Pesut
  • Sally Thorne
  • Janet Storch
  • Kenneth Chambaere
  • Madeleine Greig
  • Michael Burgess

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describes nurses' moral experiences with Medical Assistance in Dying in the Canadian context. Background Nurses perform important roles in Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada and do so within a unique context in which Medical Assistance in Dying is provided through healthcare services and where accessibility is an important principle. International literature indicates that participating in Medical Assistance in Dying can be deeply impactful for nurses and requires a high degree of moral sense‐making. Design A qualitative interview study guided by Interpretive Description using the COREQ checklist. Results Fifty‐nine nurses from across Canada participated in the study. The decision to participate in Medical Assistance in Dying was influenced by family and community, professional experience and nurses' proximity to the act of Medical Assistance in Dying. Nurses described a range of deep and sometimes conflicting emotional reactions provoked by Medical Assistance in Dying. Nurses used a number of moral waypoints to make sense of their decision including patient choice, control and certainty; an understanding that it was not about the nurse; a commitment to staying with patients through suffering; consideration of moral consistency; issues related to the afterlife; and the peace and gratitude demonstrated by patients and families. Discussion The depth of nurses' intuitional moral responses and their need to make sense of these responses are consistent with Haidt's theory of moral experience in which individuals use reasoning primarily to explain their moral intuition and in which moral change occurs primarily through compassionate social interaction. Further, work on the moral identity of nursing provides robust explanation of how nurses' moral decisions are contextually and relationally mediated and how they seek to guard patient vulnerability, even at their own emotional cost. Conclusion Medical Assistance in Dying is impactful for nurses, and for some, it requires intensive and ongoing moral sense‐making. Relevance to clinical practice There is a need to provide support for nurses' moral deliberation and emotional well‐being in the context of Medical Assistance in Dying care.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Pesut & Sally Thorne & Janet Storch & Kenneth Chambaere & Madeleine Greig & Michael Burgess, 2020. "Riding an elephant: A qualitative study of nurses' moral journeys in the context of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD)," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3870-3881, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:19-20:p:3870-3881
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15427
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wright, David Kenneth & Chan, Lisa S. & Fishman, Jennifer R. & Macdonald, Mary Ellen, 2021. "“Reflection and soul searching”: Negotiating nursing identity at the fault lines of palliative care and medical assistance in dying," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:19-20:p:3870-3881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.