IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i13-14p2352-2362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain assessment and interventions by nurses in the emergency department: A national survey

Author

Listed:
  • Wayne Varndell
  • Margaret Fry
  • Doug Elliott

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to examine the knowledge, perceptions and factors influencing pain assessment and management practices among Australian emergency nurses. Background Pain is the most commonly reported symptom in patients presenting to the emergency department, with over half rating their pain as moderate‐to‐severe. Patients unable to communicate, such as critically ill intubated patients, are at greater risk of inadequate pain management. Design This cross‐sectional exploratory study used survey methodology to explore knowledge, perceptions and factors influencing pain management practices among Australian emergency nurses. Methods Australian emergency nurses were invited to complete an online survey comprising 91 items. The response rate was 450 of 1,488 (30.2%). STROBE guidelines were used in reporting this study. Results Variations in level of acute pain management knowledge, especially in older, cognitively impaired or mechanically ventilated patients were identified. Poor interprofessional communication, workload and staffing negatively impacted on nurses’ intention to administer analgesia. For intubated patients, validated observation pain assessment instruments were rarely used, although respondents recognised the importance of pain management in critically ill patients. Conclusions Emergency nurses recognise the importance of pain relief. The ability to nurse‐initiate analgesia, education and training in pain management education is variable. Little education is provided on assessing and managing acute pain in elderly, cognitively impaired or mechanically ventilated patients. Use of validated pain assessment instruments to assess pain in critically ill patients is poor. Relevance to clinical practice While pain management is the responsibility of all healthcare professionals, in the emergency department, it is a core role of emergency nursing. This study highlights the variation in ability to nurse‐initiate analgesia, level of acute pain knowledge, education and training, and use of validated pain assessment instruments to guide pain management in critically ill intubated patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Wayne Varndell & Margaret Fry & Doug Elliott, 2020. "Pain assessment and interventions by nurses in the emergency department: A national survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2352-2362, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2352-2362
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15247
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wayne Varndell & Margaret Fry & Doug Elliott, 2015. "Emergency nurses' perceptions of sedation management practices for critically ill intubated patients: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3286-3295, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary E Braine & Neal Cook, 2017. "The Glasgow Coma Scale and evidence‐informed practice: a critical review of where we are and where we need to be," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 280-293, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:13-14:p:2352-2362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.