IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i21-22p3286-3295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergency nurses' perceptions of sedation management practices for critically ill intubated patients: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Wayne Varndell
  • Margaret Fry
  • Doug Elliott

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to explore factors influencing practices in assessing, titrating and managing sedation for the critically ill intubated patients, from the perspective of emergency nurses. Background The number of critically ill patients presenting to Australian public Emergency Departments has increased by over 30% since 1980. Emergency nurses are increasingly relied upon to manage sedation of critically ill intubated patients. There is little evidence within international literature relating to how emergency nurses accomplish this. Design Descriptive qualitative study. Method A purposive sample of 15 experienced emergency nurses participated in semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews. Transcribed data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results The qualitative analysis yielded five themes: becoming the resuscitation nurse; becoming confident as the resuscitation nurse; communicating about sedation; visual cues and the vanishing act. The safety and quality of sedation experienced by critically ill intubated patients in ED was the responsibility of emergency nurses, yet uncertainties and barriers were evident. Conclusion Patient continuity of care, including optimisation of comfort relies upon the knowledge, skills and expertise of the emergency nurse allocated to the resuscitation area. For most nurses transitioning into the resuscitation nurse role, it represents the first time they will have had contact with patients with highly complex needs and sedation. The use of self‐directed clinical workbooks and supervised clinical practice alone may be insufficient to adequately prepare nurses for the spectrum of critically ill sedated patients managed in the resuscitation area; a situation made worse in the presence of poor team communication. Relevance to clinical practice The findings of this study should assist in the development of policy and formal education of emergency nurses transitioning into the resuscitation area and the management of continuous intravenous sedation to critically ill mechanically ventilated patients is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Wayne Varndell & Margaret Fry & Doug Elliott, 2015. "Emergency nurses' perceptions of sedation management practices for critically ill intubated patients: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3286-3295, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:21-22:p:3286-3295
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12932
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12932?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mary E Braine & Neal Cook, 2017. "The Glasgow Coma Scale and evidence‐informed practice: a critical review of where we are and where we need to be," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 280-293, January.
    2. Wayne Varndell & Margaret Fry & Doug Elliott, 2020. "Pain assessment and interventions by nurses in the emergency department: A national survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2352-2362, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:21-22:p:3286-3295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.