IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i9-10p2041-2051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stroke survivors’ and carers’ experiences of a systematic voiding programme to treat urinary incontinence after stroke

Author

Listed:
  • Josephine ME Gibson
  • Lois H Thomas
  • Joanna J Harrison
  • Caroline L Watkins
  • the ICONS Project Team and the ICONS Patient, Public and Carer Involvement Groups

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the views and experiences of stroke survivors and carers about a systematic voiding programme for poststroke incontinence. Background Urinary incontinence after stroke is common and associated with poorer functional outcome. Structured assessment and management are potentially effective interventions, but it is important that there is a good understanding of stroke survivors’ and carers’ views of their acceptability and implementation. Design A qualitative study within a feasibility trial. Methods Sixteen participants (12 stroke survivors and four carers) were interviewed using a structured schedule shortly before discharge from one of six inpatient stroke units across six hospitals. Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted. Findings Participants included seven male and five female stroke survivors (mean age 76 years) and four female carers (two wives and two daughters). Themes relating to the preliminary (assessment) phase of the programme were as follows: physical impact, psychological impact, beliefs about incontinence, and the assessment process itself. Main themes relating to the implementation of the programme included the following: timed voiding decisions, adapting the programme or the timed voiding schedule, and urinary incontinence management techniques. Participants felt that the programme helped them to re‐establish a regular pattern of micturition and to regain autonomy. Conclusions The effectiveness of a systematic voiding programme may partly lie in its educational component, challenging patients’ and carers’ assumptions that poststroke incontinence is inevitable. Individual adaptation of the programme and the ability to incorporate it alongside other aspects of care are likely to be key factors influencing implementation. Relevance to clinical practice Urinary incontinence is common after stroke. To maximise benefits from a systematic voiding programme, nurses should support stroke survivors to overturn erroneous beliefs, to participate in tailoring of the programme, and in self‐management where appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • Josephine ME Gibson & Lois H Thomas & Joanna J Harrison & Caroline L Watkins & the ICONS Project Team and the ICONS Patient, Public and Carer Involvement Groups, 2018. "Stroke survivors’ and carers’ experiences of a systematic voiding programme to treat urinary incontinence after stroke," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2041-2051, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:2041-2051
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14346
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brittain, Katherine R. & Shaw, Chris, 2007. "The social consequences of living with and dealing with incontinence--A carers perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 1274-1283, September.
    2. Chien-Ning Tseng & Guey-Shiun Huang & Po-Jui Yu & Meei-Fang Lou, 2015. "A Qualitative Study of Family Caregiver Experiences of Managing Incontinence in Stroke Survivors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moore, Helen & Gillespie, Alex, 2014. "The caregiving bind: Concealing the demands of informal care can undermine the caregiving identity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 102-109.
    2. Hemachandra, Nilmini N. & Rajapaksa, Lalini C. & Manderson, Lenore, 2009. "A "usual occurrence:" Stress incontinence among reproductive aged women in Sri Lanka," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1395-1401, November.
    3. Myrta Kohler & Hanna Mayer & Jürg Kesselring & Susi Saxer, 2020. "Urinary incontinence in stroke survivors – Development of a programme theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 3089-3096, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:2041-2051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.