IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i15-16p2156-2167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Caregiving activities closely associated with the development of low‐back pain among female family caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Kishiko Suzuki
  • Koji Tamakoshi
  • Hisataka Sakakibara

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe what effects low back pain has on the daily lives of female family caregivers and to elucidate the caregiving factors associated with its development. Background Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal symptom in caregivers. However, few detailed studies have examined the association of low back pain with the daily lives of female family caregivers or which caregiving activities lead to their low back pain. The elucidation of these issues will contribute to the prevention and treatment of their low back pain. Design A cross‐sectional study. Methods Japanese female family caregivers (n = 156) completed a self‐administered questionnaire assessing lifestyle, health status, daily activity and caregiving situation. Correlation analysis measured the association between low back pain and daily activity. Logistic regression analysis identified care activities related to low back pain. Results Thirty‐five (22·4%) participants almost always experienced low back pain. The severity of low back pain was significantly and positively associated with difficulty in daily activities, especially bending and extending the lower back. As for care situation factors and caregiving activities, night care, assisting the family member to stand up and to lie down, dealing with problem behaviours, and taking medication were associated with the development of low back pain. After reclassifying the respective caregiving activities, those involving body repositioning and those mainly performed in a static position showed significant associations. Conclusions Low back pain in female family caregivers negatively affects their daily activities and certain caregiving activities are involved in the development of low back pain. Relevance to clinical practice Clinical nurses understand the situation of female caregivers and could prevent the development of low back pain with early intervention by providing adequate strategies to alleviate the burden of identified care activities related to low back pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Kishiko Suzuki & Koji Tamakoshi & Hisataka Sakakibara, 2016. "Caregiving activities closely associated with the development of low‐back pain among female family caregivers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2156-2167, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2156-2167
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13167
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudine Meijer & Pieter Bakx & Eddy Doorslaer & Marc Koopmanschap, 2015. "Explaining Declining Rates of Institutional LTC Use in the Netherlands: A Decomposition Approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24, pages 18-31, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rocío Llamas-Ramos & Laura Barrero-Santiago & Inés Llamas-Ramos & Federico Montero-Cuadrado, 2022. "Effects of a Family Caregiver Care Programme in Musculoskeletal Pain and Disability in the Shoulder-Neck Region—A Randomised Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Federico Montero-Cuadrado & Laura Barrero-Santiago & Rocío Llamas-Ramos & Inés Llamas-Ramos, 2022. "Musculoskeletal Pain in Family Caregivers: Does a Therapeutic Physical Program in Primary Care Work? A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bakx, Pieter & Wouterse, Bram & van Doorslaer, Eddy & Wong, Albert, 2020. "Better off at home? Effects of nursing home eligibility on costs, hospitalizations and survival," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Judite Gonçalves & France Weaver, 2017. "Effects of formal home care on hospitalizations and doctor visits," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 203-233, June.
    3. Plaisier, Inger & Verbeek-Oudijk, Debbie & de Klerk, Mirjam, 2017. "Developments in home-care use. Policy and changing community-based care use by independent community-dwelling adults in the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 82-89.
    4. Rellstab, Sara & Bakx, Pieter & García-Gómez, Pilar & van Doorslaer, Eddy, 2020. "The kids are alright - labour market effects of unexpected parental hospitalisations in the Netherlands," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Matthias Firgo & Klaus Nowotny & Alexander Braun, 2020. "Informal, formal, or both? Assessing the drivers of home care utilization in Austria using a simultaneous decision framework," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(40), pages 4440-4456, August.
    6. Vincenzo Atella & Federico Belotti & Ludovico Carrino & Andrea Piano Mortari, 2017. "The future of Long Term Care in Europe. An investigation using a dynamic microsimulation model," CEIS Research Paper 405, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 08 May 2017.
    7. Arjen Hussem & Casper Ewijk & Harry Rele & Albert Wong, 2016. "The Ability to Pay for Long-Term Care in the Netherlands: A Life-cycle Perspective," De Economist, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 209-234, June.
    8. Walsh, Brendan & Lyons, Seán, 2021. "Demand for the Statutory Home Care Scheme," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS122, June.
    9. Krabbe-Alkemade, Yvonne & Makai, Peter & Shestalova, Victoria & Voesenek, Tessa, 2020. "Containing or shifting? Health expenditure decomposition for the aging Dutch population after a major reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 268-274.
    10. Heger, Dörte & Korfhage, Thorben, 2016. "Care choices in Europe: To each according to his needs?," Ruhr Economic Papers 649, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    11. Matthias Firgo & Klaus Nowotny & Alexander Braun, 2017. "Austria 2025 – Informal, Formal, or Both? Assessing the Drivers of Home Care Utilisation in Austria Using a Simultaneous Decision Framework," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59741, February.
    12. Peter Alders & Hannie C. Comijs & Dorly J. H. Deeg, 2017. "Changes in admission to long-term care institutions in the Netherlands: comparing two cohorts over the period 1996–1999 and 2006–2009," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 123-131, June.
    13. Shinya Sugawara, 2022. "What composes desirable formal at-home elder care? An analysis for multiple service combinations," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 373-402, April.
    14. Arjen Hussem & Casper Ewijk & Harry Rele & Albert Wong, 2016. "The Ability to Pay for Long-Term Care in the Netherlands: A Life-cycle Perspective," De Economist, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 209-234, June.
    15. Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger & Matthias Firgo, 2018. "Aktuelle und künftige Versorgungsfunktion der mobilen Pflege- und Betreuungsdienste in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61563, April.
    16. Donnelly, Nora-Ann & Humphries, Niamh & Hickey, Anne & Doyle, Frank, 2017. "“We don’t have the infrastructure to support them at home”: How health system inadequacies impact on long-term care admissions of people with dementia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1280-1287.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2156-2167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.