IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i17-18p2458-2467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catalysts of worker‐to‐worker violence and incivility in hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Lydia E Hamblin
  • Lynnette Essenmacher
  • Mark J Upfal
  • Jim Russell
  • Mark Luborsky
  • Joel Ager
  • Judith E Arnetz

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify common catalysts of worker‐to‐worker violence and incivility in hospital settings. Background Worker‐to‐worker violence and incivility are prevalent forms of mistreatment in healthcare workplaces. These are forms of counterproductive work behaviour that can lead to negative outcomes for employees, patients and the organisation overall. Identifying the factors that lead to co‐worker mistreatment is a critical first step in the development of interventions targeting these behaviours. Design Retrospective descriptive study. Methods Qualitative content analysis was conducted on the total sample (n = 141) of employee incident reports of worker‐to‐worker violence and incivility that were documented in 2011 at a large American hospital system. Results More than 50% of the incidents involved nurses, and the majority of incidents did not involve physical violence. Two primary themes emerged from the analysis: Work Behaviour and Work Organisation. Incidents in the Work Behaviour category were often sparked by unprofessional behaviour, disagreement over responsibilities for work tasks or methods of patient care, and dissatisfaction with a co‐worker's performance. Incidents in the Work Organisation category involved conflicts or aggression arising from failure to following protocol, patient assignments, limited resources and high workload. Conclusion Incidents of worker‐to‐worker violence and incivility stemmed from dissatisfaction with employee behaviour or from organisational practices or work constraints. These incident descriptions reflect worker dissatisfaction and frustration, resulting from poor communication and collaboration between employees, all of which threaten work productivity. Relevance to clinical practice Violence and incivility between hospital employees can contribute to turnover of top performers, hinder effective teamwork and jeopardise the quality of patient care. Identification of common catalysts for worker‐to‐worker violence and incivility informs the development of mistreatment prevention programmes that can be used to educate hospital staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Lydia E Hamblin & Lynnette Essenmacher & Mark J Upfal & Jim Russell & Mark Luborsky & Joel Ager & Judith E Arnetz, 2015. "Catalysts of worker‐to‐worker violence and incivility in hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2458-2467, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:17-18:p:2458-2467
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12825
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnetz, Judith E. & Arnetz, Bengt B., 2001. "Violence towards health care staff and possible effects on the quality of patient care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 417-427, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naser Parizad & Hadi Hassankhani & Azad Rahmani & Eesa Mohammadi & Violeta Lopez & Michelle Cleary, 2018. "Nurses’ experiences of unprofessional behaviors in the emergency department: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 54-59, March.
    2. María Joao Vidal-Alves & David Pina & Esteban Puente-López & Aurelio Luna-Maldonado & Aurelio Luna Ruiz-Cabello & Teresa Magalhães & Yolanda Pina-López & José Antonio Ruiz-Hernández & Begoña Martínez , 2021. "Tough Love Lessons: Lateral Violence among Hospital Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Mitchell J. Neubert & Emily M. Hunter & Remy C. Tolentino, 2022. "Modeling Character: Servant Leaders, Incivility and Patient Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 261-278, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Zhao & Xiaoxue Li & Benno Torgler & Uwe Dulleck, 2021. "Patient violence, physicians treatment decisions, and patient welfare: Evidence from China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1461-1479, June.
    2. Sabine Hahn & Marianne Müller & Ian Needham & Theo Dassen & Gerjo Kok & Ruud JG Halfens, 2010. "Factors associated with patient and visitor violence experienced by nurses in general hospitals in Switzerland: a cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3535-3546, December.
    3. Jee-Hyun Hwang, 2021. "Mediating Effects of Psychological States on Work Performance of Visiting Nurses According to COVID-19 Workplace Quarantine Measures: A Multi-Group Path Analysis Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Eunjoo Kim & Heeseung Choi & Ju Young Yoon, 2020. "Who Cares for Visiting Nurses? Workplace Violence against Home Visiting Nurses from Public Health Centers in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Linda Anderson & Mary FitzGerald & Lauretta Luck, 2010. "An integrative literature review of interventions to reduce violence against emergency department nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2520-2530, September.
    6. Jakub Lickiewicz & Paweł Jagielski & Patricia Paulsen Hughes & Marta Makara-Studzińska, 2020. "The Gender-Related Impact of a Violence Management Training Program on Medical School Students—Preliminary Results," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-9, September.
    7. Booth, Jonathan E. & Park, Tae-Youn & Zhu, Luke (Lei) & Beauregard, T. Alexandra & Gu, Fan & Emery, Cécile, 2018. "Prosocial response to client-instigated victimization: the roles of forgiveness and workgroup conflict," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85632, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Herron, R.V. & Wrathall, M.A., 2018. "Putting responsive behaviours in place: Examining how formal and informal carers understand the actions of people with dementia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 9-15.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:17-18:p:2458-2467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.