IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i21-22p3012-3024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of nursing home residents and physical restraint: a systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Hedi Hofmann
  • Sabine Hahn

Abstract

Aims and objectives To analyse and to summarise factors associated with nursing home residents' characteristics which could lead to physical restraint, and to investigate the consequences of physical restraint use for this population. Background Even though the application of physical restraint is highly controversial, prevalence rates show that it is a common intervention in nursing homes. Residents' characteristics seem to be important to predict the use of physical restraint. Evidence suggests that restrained nursing home residents may have physical and psychological disadvantages as a consequence of being restrained. Methods A systematic literature research involving the databases PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ISI Web of Science and Cochrane Library was carried out for articles published from January 2005–November 2011. Nine Studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and the quality assessment. Results Restrained residents had low activities of daily living (ADL) scores and severe cognitive impairment. Residents with low cognitive status and serious mobility impairments were at high risk to be restrained, as well as residents with previous fall and/or fracture. Repeated verbal and physical agitation was found to be positively associated with restraint use. Possible consequences of physical restraint were as follows: lower cognitive and ADL performance, higher walking dependence, furthermore falls, pressure ulcers, urinary and faecal incontinence. Conclusions This systematic literature review reveals notable resident‐related factors for physical restraint use. The consequences of restraint seem to negatively influence residents' physical and psychological well‐being. Physical restraint seems to be an important risk factor for residents' further health problems. Relevance to clinical practice Resident's characteristics appear to be decisive factors for the use of physical restraint. Nurses need a high level of expertise and competence in evaluating the individual residents′ situation and deciding further steps, with respect for the autonomy and dignity of the person.

Suggested Citation

  • Hedi Hofmann & Sabine Hahn, 2014. "Characteristics of nursing home residents and physical restraint: a systematic literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3012-3024, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3012-3024
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12384
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12384?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huizing, Anna R. & Hamers, Jan P.H. & de Jonge, Jan & Candel, Math & Berger, Martijn P.F., 2007. "Organisational determinants of the use of physical restraints: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 924-933, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silvia Thomann & Gesche Gleichner & Sabine Hahn & Sandra Zwakhalen, 2022. "Attitudes of Nursing Staff in Hospitals towards Restraint Use: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Lauren M. Robins & Den-Ching A. Lee & J Simon Bell & Velandai Srikanth & Ralph Möhler & Keith D. Hill & Terry P. Haines, 2021. "Definition and Measurement of Physical and Chemical Restraint in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Büşra Ertuğrul & Dilek Özden, 2023. "Physical Restraint Experiences of Family Caregivers of Patients With Stroke in Turkey: A Qualitative Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(3), pages 499-509, March.
    4. Karen Watson & Deborah Hatcher, 2021. "Factors influencing management of agitation in aged care facilities: A qualitative study of staff perceptions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 136-144, January.
    5. Kateřina Macháčová & Hana Vaňková & Iva Holmerová & Inna Čábelková & Ladislav Volicer, 2018. "Ratings of activities of daily living in nursing home residents: comparison of self- and proxy ratings with actual performance and the impact of cognitive status," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 349-358, December.
    6. Alvisa Palese & Matteo Danielis & Chiara Cicogna & Luca Grassetti, 2020. "Does missed nursing care influence the use of physical restraint and its duration in acute medical patients? Secondary analysis of a longitudinal study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 929-940, December.
    7. David Huynh & Olivia N. Lee & Phuong M. An & Twyla A. Ens & Cynthia A. Mannion, 2021. "Bedrails and Falls in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(1), pages 5-11, January.
    8. Alba Carrero-Planells & Ana Urrutia-Beaskoa & Cristina Moreno-Mulet, 2021. "The Use of Physical Restraints on Geriatric Patients: Culture and Attitudes among Healthcare Professionals at Intermediate Care Hospitals in Majorca. A Qualitative Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-11, July.
    9. James Chung-Wai Cheung & Eric Wing-Cheung Tam & Alex Hing-Yin Mak & Tim Tin-Chun Chan & Yong-Ping Zheng, 2022. "A Night-Time Monitoring System (eNightLog) to Prevent Elderly Wandering in Hostels: A Three-Month Field Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Elisa Ambrosi & Martina Debiasi & Jessica Longhini & Lorenzo Giori & Luisa Saiani & Elisabetta Mezzalira & Federica Canzan, 2021. "Variation of the Occurrence of Physical Restraint Use in the Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-11, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisa Ambrosi & Martina Debiasi & Jessica Longhini & Lorenzo Giori & Luisa Saiani & Elisabetta Mezzalira & Federica Canzan, 2021. "Variation of the Occurrence of Physical Restraint Use in the Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Reetta Saarnio & Arja Isola, 2010. "Nursing staff perceptions of the use of physical restraint in institutional care of older people in Finland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3197-3207, November.
    3. María Acevedo-Nuevo & María Teresa González-Gil & María Concepción Martin-Arribas, 2021. "Physical Restraint Use in Intensive Care Units: Exploring the Decision-Making Process and New Proposals. A Multimethod Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-36, November.
    4. Christine Øye & Frode Fadnes Jacobsen & Tone Elin Mekki, 2017. "Do organisational constraints explain the use of restraint? A comparative ethnographic study from three nursing homes in Norway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1906-1916, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3012-3024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.