IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i13-14p2057-2064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why carers of frail older people are not using available respite services: an Australian study

Author

Listed:
  • Gillian Stockwell‐Smith
  • Ursula Kellett
  • Wendy Moyle

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of this study was to explore the limiting and motivating factors that influence carers’ use of respite services and the ability of currently available respite services to meet the needs of carers of frail older people. Background. The development of community carer support services, their availability and usage and the common barriers that affect or impact on carers’ use of community services in general and respite services in particular need to be examined to ensure they meet client needs. Design. A qualitative descriptive approach informed by critical social theory was used to expose the inequities inherent in community services. Methods. A qualitative examination of carer relationships with respite services was informed and guided by critical theory. Sixteen carers took part in four focus groups. A purposeful sampling strategy was adopted to engage with carers not currently using respite services. Study participants were recruited from a state‐wide carer support organisation and a community service organisation in Queensland, Australia. Results. Three themes emerged from the data: ‘Commitment’ characterised by reciprocity, role definition and role frustration, ‘Needing Help’ discussed in terms of trust, confidence in service, fear and resistance, and ‘Support’ discussed in relation to informal networking, misinformation and lack of knowledge. Conclusion. This study improves our understanding of the caring role, its significance in carer’s lives and how this shapes their formal service expectations and use. The findings suggest that further investigation of the factors involved in carers’ service expectations and service‐seeking is warranted to develop a deeper understanding of how care giving influences the ways carers seek help from formal services. Relevance to clinical practice. Service delivery changes towards a model of care, which engages and promotes user control and fosters genuine participatory relations between informal and professional carers may improve uptake of respite services.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillian Stockwell‐Smith & Ursula Kellett & Wendy Moyle, 2010. "Why carers of frail older people are not using available respite services: an Australian study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(13‐14), pages 2057-2064, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:2057-2064
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03139.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03139.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03139.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Productivity Commission, 2008. "Trends in Aged Care Services: some implications," Research Papers 0803, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Binod Nepal & Laurie Brown & Simon Kelly & Richard Percival & Phil Anderson & Ruth Hancock & Geetha Ranmuthugala, 2011. "Projecting the Need for Formal and Informal Aged Care in Australia: A Dynamic Microsimulation Approach," NATSEM Working Paper Series 11/07, University of Canberra, National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling.
    2. Tran, My (Michelle) & Gannon, Brenda, 2021. "The regional effect of the consumer directed care model for older people in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    3. Nerina Vecchio & Nicholas Rohde, 2017. "The effect of inadequate access to healthcare services on emergency room visits in Australia," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201708, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    4. Nicholas Ralph & Melanie Birks & Ysanne Chapman & Karen Francis, 2014. "Future-Proofing Nursing Education," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, November.
    5. Henry Ergas, 2009. "Providing Aged Care: The Case for Reform," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 16(2), pages 21-44.
    6. Kaambwa, Billingsley & Chen, Gang & Khadka, Jyoti & Milte, Rachel & Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine & Woods, Taylor-Jade & Ratcliffe, Julie, 2021. "A preference for quality: Australian general public's willingness to pay for home and residential aged care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    7. My (Michelle) Tran & Brenda Gannon, 2020. "Home Care Providers in Queensland: Exploratory Data Analysis Using My Aged Care Platform," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 53(4), pages 598-604, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:2057-2064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.