IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v66y2013i3-4p45-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The social protection floor and global social governance: Towards policy synergy and cooperation between international organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Bob Deacon

Abstract

This article addresses the influence of the International Labour Organization (ILO) on other international organizations and global agencies which resulted in their endorsement of the Social Protection Floor (SFP) concept. By 2012 the concept had been endorsed by the United Nations in the shape of the UN Chief Executives Board's SPF‐Initiative, the World Bank in its new Social Protection and Labor Strategy and by the G20 at the Cannes Summit. Furthermore the IMF had agreed to work with the ILO to explore the options for creating fiscal space within countries to fund SPFs. Special Rapporteurs for the UN Human Rights Council had also in 2012 called for the setting up of a global fund for social protection to enable poorer countries to develop their floors. By 2012 a new coordinating authority, the Social Protection Inter‐Agency Cooperation Board (SPIAC‐B), had been ushered into existence to facilitate inter‐agency cooperation. This article describes and explains how these developments came about. It asks if the reality of increased global social governance cooperation in the field of social protection is as effective as it seems or whether there are new contradictions, overlapping and competing mandates and policy disagreements at the global level.

Suggested Citation

  • Bob Deacon, 2013. "The social protection floor and global social governance: Towards policy synergy and cooperation between international organizations," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(3-4), pages 45-67, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:66:y:2013:i:3-4:p:45-67
    DOI: 10.1111/issr.12018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/issr.12018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Litao Zhao & Xiaobin He, 2021. "Lessons from China on different approaches to pension coverage extension," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(1), pages 5-34, January.
    2. Sam Hickey & Jeremy Seekings, 2017. "The global politics of social protection," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-115, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Mariana Balboni & Marina Carvalho & Patricia Velloso & Roberta Brito, 2022. "The role of socialprotection.org in fostering knowledge exchange and capacity-building in social protection through a knowledge brokering perspective," Research Report 77, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    4. Özgür Hakan ÇAVUŞ, 2016. "The Role of ILO’s Recommendation of National Social Protection Floors in the Extension of Social Security," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 24(28).
    5. Sam Hickey & Jeremy Seekings, 2017. "The global politics of social protection," WIDER Working Paper Series 115, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Kentikelenis, Alexander E. & Stubbs, Thomas H. & King, Lawrence P., 2015. "Structural adjustment and public spending on health: Evidence from IMF programs in low-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 169-176.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:66:y:2013:i:3-4:p:45-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.