IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v21y2016i4p502-527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Cycle, Business Cycle and Monetary Policy: Evidence from Four Major Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Ma
  • Jinglan Zhang

Abstract

Economists used to think that financial factors are not important in the business cycle, but the 2008 global financial crisis has made it apparent that financial cycle plays a much larger role in macroeconomic dynamics than anticipated. Against this background, economists endeavor to introduce financial factors into macroeconomic models. In this paper, we incorporate financial cycle into a four‐equation model to study the linkages and interactions between financial cycle, business cycle and monetary policy. The results suggest that financial cycle plays a significant role in the business cycle, and that financial cycle shock has become a main driving force for macroeconomic fluctuations, especially during times of financial instability. In addition, by comparing the performance of the finance‐augmented Taylor rule with that of the conventional Taylor rule, we find that both the financial system and the real economy will be better stabilized under the finance‐augmented Taylor rule. This result adds new evidence to the argument that monetary policy has an important role in safeguarding the financial system and that financial stability should be adopted as a target for monetary policy. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Ma & Jinglan Zhang, 2016. "Financial Cycle, Business Cycle and Monetary Policy: Evidence from Four Major Economies," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 502-527, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:21:y:2016:i:4:p:502-527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eugenio Caverzasi & Alberto Russo, 2018. "Toward a new microfounded macroeconomics in the wake of the crisis," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 999-1014.
    2. Yan, Chuanpeng & Huang, Kevin X.D., 2020. "Financial cycle and business cycle: An empirical analysis based on the data from the U.S," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 693-701.
    3. Xue, Wenjun & Zhang, Liwen, 2019. "Revisiting the asymmetric effects of bank credit on the business cycle: A panel quantile regression approach," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    4. Stockhammer, Engelbert & Calvert Jump, Robert & Kohler, Karsten & Cavallero, Julian, 2019. "Short and medium term financial-real cycles: An empirical assessment," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 81-96.
    5. Kurowski, Łukasz & Rogowicz, Karol, 2018. "Are business and credit cycles synchronised internally or externally?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 124-141.
    6. Saad Ahmad, 2020. "Identifying a robust policy rule for the Fed's response to financial stress," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 565-578, October.
    7. Tran, Thuy Nhung, 2022. "The Volatility of the Stock Market and Financial Cycle: GARCH Family Models," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 56(1), pages 151-168.
    8. Jaromir Baxa & Jan Zacek, 2022. "Monetary Policy and the Financial Cycle: International Evidence," Working Papers 2022/4, Czech National Bank.
    9. Veysel KARAGOL & Burhan DOÄžAN, 2021. "Interaction between business and financial cycles: evidence from Turkey," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12, pages 123-150, December.
    10. Yunus, Nafeesa, 2023. "Long-run and short-run impact of the U.S. economy on stock, bond and housing markets: An evaluation of U.S. and six major economies," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 211-232.
    11. Stefan Ederer & Miriam Rehm, 2018. "Making sense of Piketty’s ‘fundamental laws’ in a Post-Keynesian framework," Working Papers PKWP1808, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:21:y:2016:i:4:p:502-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.