IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v26y2017is1p30-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Regional Variation of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Device Implant Rates in European Healthcare Systems: What Drives Differences?

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Torbica
  • Helen Banks
  • Cinzia Valzania
  • Giuseppe Boriani
  • Giovanni Fattore

Abstract

Despite established efficacy for cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs), large differences in CIED implant rates have been documented across and within countries. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of socio‐economic, epidemiological and supply side factors on CIED implant rates across 57 Regions in 5 EU countries and to assess the feasibility of using administrative data for this purpose. A total of 1 330 098 hospitalizations for CIED procedures extracted from hospital discharge databases in Austria, England, Germany, Italy and Slovenia from 2008 to 2012 was used in the analysis. Higher levels of tertiary education among the labour force and percent of aged population are positively associated with implant rates of CIED. Regional per capita GDP and number of implanting centres appear to have no significant effect. Institutional factors are shown to be important for the diffusion of CIED. Wide variation in CIED implant rates across and within five EU countries is undeniable. However, regional factors play a limited part in explaining these differences with few exceptions. Administrative databases are a valuable source of data for investigating the diffusion of medical technologies, while the choice of appropriate modelling strategy is crucial in identifying the drivers for variation across countries. © 2017 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Torbica & Helen Banks & Cinzia Valzania & Giuseppe Boriani & Giovanni Fattore, 2017. "Investigating Regional Variation of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Device Implant Rates in European Healthcare Systems: What Drives Differences?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S1), pages 30-45, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:26:y:2017:i:s1:p:30-45
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.3470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3470
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.3470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mickael Bech & Terkel Christiansen & Kelly Dunham & Jørgen Lauridsen & Carl Hampus Lyttkens & Kathryn McDonald & Alistair McGuire & and the TECH Investigators, 2009. "The influence of economic incentives and regulatory factors on the adoption of treatment technologies: a case study of technologies used to treat heart attacks," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(10), pages 1114-1132, October.
    2. Peter Willemé & Michel Dumont, 2016. "Machines that go ‘ping’: Medical Technology and Health Expenditures in OECD Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 387-388, March.
    3. Valzania, Cinzia & Torbica, Aleksandra & Tarricone, Rosanna & Leyva, Francisco & Boriani, Giuseppe, 2016. "Implant rates of cardiac implantable electrical devices in Europe: A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 1-15.
    4. Terkel Christiansen & Kelly Dunham & Jørgen Lauridsen & Carl Hampus Lyttkens & Kathryn Mcdonald & Alistair Mcguire & Carine Milcent, 2009. "The influence of economic incentives and regulatory factors on the adoption of treatment technologies: a case study of technologies used to treat heart attacks," Post-Print halshs-03168477, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meilin Möllenkamp & Benedetta Pongiglione & Stefan Rabbe & Aleksandra Torbica & Jonas Schreyögg, 2022. "Spillover effects and other determinants of medical device uptake in the presence of a medical guideline: An analysis of drug‐eluting stents in Germany and Italy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(S1), pages 157-178, September.
    2. Rosanna Tarricone & Aleksandra Torbica & Michael Drummond & for the MedtecHTA Project Group, 2017. "Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S1), pages 145-152, February.
    3. Rosanna Tarricone & Aleksandra Torbica & Michael Drummond, 2017. "Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S1), pages 5-12, February.
    4. Stefan Rabbe & Meilin Möllenkamp & Benedetta Pongiglione & Hedwig Blommestein & Pim Wetzelaer & Renaud Heine & Jonas Schreyögg, 2022. "Variation in the utilization of medical devices across Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands: A multilevel approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(S1), pages 135-156, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maynou, L. & McGuire, A. & Serra-Sastre, V., 2019. "Exploring the Impact of New Medical Technology on Workforce Planning," Working Papers 19/07, Department of Economics, City University London.
    2. Terje P. Hagen & Unto Häkkinen & Tor Iversen & Søren Toksvig Klitkou & Tron Anders Moger & on behalf of the EuroHOPE study group, 2015. "Socio‐economic Inequality in the Use of Procedures and Mortality Among AMI Patients: Quantifying the Effects Along Different Paths," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S2), pages 102-115, December.
    3. Maximilian H. M. Hatz & Jonas Schreyögg & Aleksandra Torbica & Giuseppe Boriani & Carl R. B. Blankart, 2017. "Adoption Decisions for Medical Devices in the Field of Cardiology: Results from a European Survey," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S1), pages 124-144, February.
    4. Köppen, Julia & Maier, Claudia B. & Busse, Reinhard, 2018. "What are the motivating and hindering factors for health professionals to undertake new roles in hospitals? A study among physicians, nurses and managers looking at breast cancer and acute myocardial ," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(10), pages 1118-1125.
    5. Hyclak, Thomas J. & Skeels, Christopher L. & Taylor, Larry W., 2016. "The cardiovascular revolution and economic performance in the OECD countries," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 114-125.
    6. Finocchiaro Castro, Massimo & Guccio, Calogero & Pignataro, Giacomo & Rizzo, Ilde, 2014. "The effects of reimbursement mechanisms on medical technology diffusion in the hospital sector in the Italian NHS," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 215-229.
    7. Patricia Ex & Cornelia Henschke, 2019. "Changing payment instruments and the utilisation of new medical technologies," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(7), pages 1029-1039, September.
    8. Richard Heijink & Peter Engelfriet & Clas Rehnberg & Sverre A. C. Kittelsen & Unto Häkkinen & on behalf of the EuroHOPE study group, 2015. "A Window on Geographic Variation in Health Care: Insights from EuroHOPE," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S2), pages 164-177, December.
    9. Liu, Ya-Ming & Kao Yang, Yea-Huei & Hsieh, Chee-Ruey, 2011. "The determinants of the adoption of pharmaceutical innovation: Evidence from Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 919-927, March.
    10. Michele Bisceglia & Roberto Cellini & Luca Grilli, 2018. "Regional regulators in health care service under quality competition: A game theoretical model," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(11), pages 1821-1842, November.
    11. David H. Howard & Yu-Chu Shen, 2011. "Comparative Effectiveness Research, COURAGE, and Technological Abandonment," NBER Working Papers 17371, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Pablo Celhay & Paul Gertler & Paula Giavagnoli & Christel Vermeersch, 2016. "Nudging Medical Providers to Adopt and Sustain Better Quality Care Practices," Natural Field Experiments 00537, The Field Experiments Website.
    13. Karine Lamiraud & Stephane Lhuillery, 2016. "Endogenous Technology Adoption and Medical Costs," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(9), pages 1123-1147, September.
    14. Elisabet Rodriguez Llorian & Janelle Mann, 2022. "Exploring the technology–healthcare expenditure nexus: a panel error correction approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 3061-3086, June.
    15. Karmann Alexander & Rösel Felix & Schneider Markus, 2016. "Produktivitätsmotor Gesundheitswirtschaft: Finanziert sich der medizinisch-technische Fortschritt selbst?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 54-67, April.
    16. Mauro Laudicella & Paolo Li Donni & Kim Rose Olsen & Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen, 2022. "Age, morbidity, or something else? A residual approach using microdata to measure the impact of technological progress on health care expenditure," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 1184-1201, June.
    17. Karine Lamiraud & Stéphane Lhuillery, 2015. "Endogenous Technology Adoption and Medical Costs," Working Papers hal-01218064, HAL.
    18. Varabyova, Yauheniya & Blankart, Carl Rudolf & Greer, Ann Lennarson & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2017. "The determinants of medical technology adoption in different decisional systems: A systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 230-242.
    19. Kris Ivanovski & Sefa Awaworyi Churchill, 2021. "Has healthcare expenditure converged across Australian states and territories?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 3401-3417, December.
    20. Rosanna Tarricone & Aleksandra Torbica & Michael Drummond, 2017. "Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S1), pages 5-12, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:26:y:2017:i:s1:p:30-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.