IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v10y2001i7p583-585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘fair innings argument’ deserves a fairer hearing! comments by Alan Williams on Nord and Johannesson

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Williams

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Williams, 2001. "The ‘fair innings argument’ deserves a fairer hearing! comments by Alan Williams on Nord and Johannesson," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(7), pages 583-585, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:10:y:2001:i:7:p:583-585
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.645
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew M. Jones (ed.), 2012. "The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Second Edition," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14021.
    2. Michael Drummond, 2012. "Economic Evaluation and Decision-makers," Chapters, in: Andrew M. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Second Edition, chapter 54, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Nord, Erik, 2005. "Concerns for the worse off: fair innings versus severity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 257-263, January.
    4. Louise B. Russell, 2004. "Is Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Unfair?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 24(2), pages 232-234, March.
    5. Adam Oliver, 2004. "Prioritizing Health Care: Is “Health†Always an Appropriate Maximand?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 24(3), pages 272-280, June.
    6. David R. Holtgrave, 2004. "HIV Prevention, Cost-Utility Analysis, and Race/Ethnicity: Methodological Considerations and Recommendations," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 24(2), pages 181-191, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:10:y:2001:i:7:p:583-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.