IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v11y2021i2p360-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating probability of containment effectiveness at a GCS site using integrated assessment modeling approach with Bayesian decision network

Author

Listed:
  • Zan Wang
  • Robert M. Dilmore
  • Diana H. Bacon
  • William Harbert

Abstract

Improved scientific and engineering understanding of the behavior of geologic CO2 storage together with established regulatory framework and incentive structures raise the prospects for accelerated, large‐scale deployment of this greenhouse gas emissions reduction approach. Incentive structures call for the establishment of appropriate verification and accounting approaches to support claims of the integrity of a geologic storage complex and to justify taking credit for long‐term storage. In this study, we present a framework for assessing the probability of containment effectiveness over the lifetime of a geologic carbon storage site (e.g., after 70 years of injection and postinjection site performance) using forward stochastic model realizations based on site characterization data and using a monitoring‐informed Bayesian network based on hypothetical detectability from surface seismic surveys over the site injection and post‐injection phases. The National Risk Assessment Partnership's open‐source Integrated Assessment Model (NRAP‐Open‐IAM) was utilized to develop an ensemble of 10,000 a priori stochastic forecasts of CO2 containment. Those simulations were used to train the Bayesian network model to estimate the prior probabilities of the CO2 leakage mass into overlying, monitorable aquifers considering the uncertainties in the reservoir properties, permeability of potentially leaky wells and the overlying aquifers. The conditional probabilities in the Bayesian network were either learned from the NRAP‐Open‐IAM simulations or derived from the predefined detection thresholds for the monitoring method. Observations obtained from monitoring, over time during the site operation phases were then used to generate updated posterior probabilities of containment (and any loss from containment) in the Bayesian network by propagating the prior probabilities through the conditional probabilities. We demonstrate how to construct and use the Bayesian network for verifying the long‐term storage complex effectiveness informed by monitoring based on the NRAP‐Open‐IAM simulations previously developed for the FutureGen 2.0 site. This approach may have relevance for stake holders to demonstrate secure geologic storage, provide a defensible, probabilistic approach to claim credit for geologic storage, and to estimate the likelihood that any fraction of the claimed credit may need to be refunded to the creditor based on available monitoring information. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Zan Wang & Robert M. Dilmore & Diana H. Bacon & William Harbert, 2021. "Evaluating probability of containment effectiveness at a GCS site using integrated assessment modeling approach with Bayesian decision network," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 360-376, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:360-376
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2056
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ya‐Mei Yang & Mitchell J. Small & Egemen O. Ogretim & Donald D. Gray & Arthur W. Wells & Grant S. Bromhal & Brian R. Strazisar, 2012. "A Bayesian belief network (BBN) for combining evidence from multiple CO 2 leak detection technologies," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 2(3), pages 185-199, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Yusha & Man, Yi, 2023. "Energy consumption and carbon emissions forecasting for industrial processes: Status, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Bailian & Harp, Dylan R. & Lin, Youzuo & Keating, Elizabeth H. & Pawar, Rajesh J., 2018. "Geologic CO2 sequestration monitoring design: A machine learning and uncertainty quantification based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 332-345.
    2. Zan Wang & Mitchell J. Small, 2016. "Statistical performance of CO 2 leakage detection using seismic travel time measurements," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 55-69, February.
    3. Krause, Jette & Small, Mitchell J. & Haas, Armin & Jaeger, Carlo C., 2016. "An expert-based bayesian assessment of 2030 German new vehicle CO2 emissions and related costs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 197-208.
    4. Small, Mitchell J. & Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle & Kefford, Benjamin M. & Stringer, Martin & Schmeda-Lopez, Diego R. & Greig, Chris & Ballinger, Benjamin & Wilson, Stephen & Smart, Simon, 2019. "Generating linked technology-socioeconomic scenarios for emerging energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1402-1423.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:360-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.