IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fistud/v40y2019i4p621-661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Labour Supply and the Production of Healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Lee
  • Carol Propper
  • George Stoye

Abstract

Medical labour markets are important because of their size and the importance of medical labour in the production of healthcare and in subsequent patient outcomes. We present a summary of important trends in the UK medical labour market, and we review the latest research on factors that determine medical labour supply and the impact of labour on patient outcomes. The topics examined include: the responsiveness of labour supply to changes in wages, regulation and other incentives; factors that determine the wide variation in physician practice and style; and the effect of teams and management quality on patient outcomes. This literature reveals that while labour supply is relatively unresponsive to changes in wages, medical personnel do react strongly to other incentives, even in the short run. This is likely to have consequences for the quality of care provided to patients. We set out a series of unanswered questions in the UK setting, including: the importance of non‐financial incentives in recruiting and retaining medical staff; how individuals can be incentivised to work in particular specialties and regions; and how medical teams can be best organised to improve care.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Lee & Carol Propper & George Stoye, 2019. "Medical Labour Supply and the Production of Healthcare," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 621-661, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:40:y:2019:i:4:p:621-661
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-5890.12198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12198
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-5890.12198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sayli, Melisa & Moscelli, Giuseppe & Blanden, Jo & Bojke, Chris & Mello, Marco, 2022. "Do Non-monetary Interventions Improve Staff Retention? Evidence from English NHS Hospitals," IZA Discussion Papers 15480, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Carol Propper & George Stoye & Max Warner, 2023. "The effects of pension reforms on physician labour supply: Evidence from the English NHS," IFS Working Papers W23/26, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Moscelli, G.; & Sayli, M.; & Blanden, J.; & Mello, M.; & Castro-Pires, H.; & Bojke, C.;, 2023. "Non-monetary interventions, workforce retention and hospital quality: evidence from the English NHS," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 23/13, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Bernard Fortin & Nicolas Jacquemet & Bruce Shearer, 2021. "Labour supply, service intensity, and contracts: Theory and evidence on physicians," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(6), pages 686-702, September.
    5. Lindo, Jason M. & Pineda-Torres, Mayra, 2021. "New Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Waiting Periods for Abortion," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Carol Propper & George Stoye & Ben Zaranko, 2020. "The Wider Impacts of the Coronavirus Pandemic on the NHS," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 345-356, June.
    7. Neprash, Hannah T. & Zink, Anna & Sheridan, Bethany & Hempstead, Katherine, 2021. "The effect of Medicaid expansion on Medicaid participation, payer mix, and labor supply in primary care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Moscelli, Giuseppe & Sayli, Melisa & Blanden, Jo & Mello, Marco & Castro-Pires, Henrique & Bojke, Chris, 2023. "Non-monetary Interventions, Workforce Retention and Hospital Quality: Evidence from the English NHS," IZA Discussion Papers 16379, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fistud:v:40:y:2019:i:4:p:621-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-5890 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.