IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v12y2005i1p55-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate social responsibility: a comparison between the United States and the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel J. Tschopp

Abstract

Investments in social and environmental funds have increased dramatically over the past decade. This has led to an increased reliance on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. There is a growing debate as to how the information should be reported. The purpose of this article is to compare how the governments and corporations of the United States and the European Union have addressed this issue. While neither the United States nor the European Union appears close to any sort of mandatory regulation of CSR reporting, the movement in Europe seems more progressive on the issue. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel J. Tschopp, 2005. "Corporate social responsibility: a comparison between the United States and the European Union," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 55-59, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:12:y:2005:i:1:p:55-59
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.69
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.69?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hess, David, 2001. "Regulating Corporate Social Performance: A New Look at Social Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 307-330, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vong, Fanny & Wong, IpKin Anthony, 2013. "Corporate and social performance links in the gaming industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1674-1681.
    2. Manuel De Nicola & Anna Maria Maurizi, 2023. "What do companies report about their digital transformation?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2), pages 165-185.
    3. Sonia Dickinson‐Delaporte & Kathleen Mortimer & Gayle Kerr & David S Waller & Alice Kendrick, 2020. "Power and responsibility: Advertising self‐regulation and consumer protection in a digital world," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 675-700, June.
    4. André Sobczak, 2003. "Codes of conduct in subcontracting networks : a labour law perspective," Post-Print hal-00687429, HAL.
    5. Mary Lyn Stoll, 2002. "The Ethics of Marketing Good Corporate Conduct," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 121-129, November.
    6. Miguel Rivera-Santos & Carlos Rufín, 2010. "Odd Couples: Understanding the Governance of Firm–NGO Alliances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 55-70, July.
    7. Andreas Rasche & Dorothea Baur & Mariëtte Huijstee & Stephen Ladek & Jayanthi Naidu & Cecilia Perla & Esther Schouten & Michael Valente & Mingrui Zhang, 2008. "Corporations as Political Actors – A Report on the First Swiss Master Class in Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 151-173, June.
    8. Broadstock, David C. & Matousek, Roman & Meyer, Martin & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 99-110.
    9. Daniel Tschopp & Ronald Huefner, 2015. "Comparing the Evolution of CSR Reporting to that of Financial Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 565-577, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:12:y:2005:i:1:p:55-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.