IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/canjec/v34y2001i2p411-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In and out of the labour market: long‐term income consequences of child‐related interruptions to women's paid work

Author

Listed:
  • Shelley Phipps
  • Peter Burton
  • Lynn Lethbridge

Abstract

Why do Canadian mothers have lower incomes than women who have never had children? Microdata from the 1995 GSS allow examination of two hypotheses: (1) mothers have spent more time out of the labour force, thus acquiring less human capital; (2) higher levels of unpaid work lead to fatigue and/or scheduling difficulties. Measuring work history does little to account for the ‘family gap.’ The estimated child penalty is reduced by allowing for ‘human capital depreciation’ and controlling for unpaid work hours, but the two hypotheses together cannot entirely explain the gap. JEL Classification: J0, J3 Entrées et sorties: marché du travail et conséquences à long terme des interruptions dans l'expérience sur le marché du travail à cause des enfants. Ce mémoire se demande pourquoi les femmes canadiennes qui ont eu des enfants ont des revenus plus bas que ceux des femmes qui n'en ont pas eus. Les microdonnées de l'Enquête sociale générale de 1995 de Statistiques Canada permettent d'examiner deux hypothèses: (1) les mères ont passé plus de temps en dehors de la main d'oeuvre active et donc ont accumulé moins de capital humain, ou (2) des niveaux plus élevés de travail non‐rémunéré peuvent entraîner fatigue ou difficultés d'organisation du temps. Des efforts pour construire une meilleure image de l'expérience de travail des femmes ne permettent pas d'expliquer cet ‘écart familial,’ même si la possibilité qu'il y ait ‘dépréciation du capital humain’ réduit la pénalisation attachée au fait d'avoir un enfant en particulier si l'interruption dans l'expérience sur le marché du travail est suivie d'un changement d'emploi. Le nombre hebdomadaire d'heures de travail non payé est relié négativement aux revenus, et si l'on normalise pour tenir compte des heures de travail non payé cela réduit la pénalisation attachée au fait d'avoir un enfant. Cependant les deux hypothèses combinées ne suffisent pas pour expliquer l'écart.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelley Phipps & Peter Burton & Lynn Lethbridge, 2001. "In and out of the labour market: long‐term income consequences of child‐related interruptions to women's paid work," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 411-429, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:canjec:v:34:y:2001:i:2:p:411-429
    DOI: 10.1111/0008-4085.00081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0008-4085.00081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J0 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General
    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:canjec:v:34:y:2001:i:2:p:411-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5982 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.