IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v19y2023i3ne1352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring COVID‐19 education to support vaccine confidence amongst the general adult population with special considerations for healthcare and long‐term care staff: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Maya Murmann
  • Anna Cooper Reed
  • Mary Scott
  • Justin Presseau
  • Carrie Heer
  • Kathryn May
  • Amy Ramzy
  • Chau N. Huynh
  • Becky Skidmore
  • Vivian Welch
  • Julian Little
  • Kumanan Wilson
  • Melissa Brouwers
  • Amy T. Hsu

Abstract

Background Despite the demonstrated efficacy of approved COVID‐19 vaccines, high levels of hesitancy were observed in the first few months of the COVID‐19 vaccines' rollout. Factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy are well‐described in the literature. Among the various strategies for promoting vaccine confidence, educational interventions provide a foundationally and widely implemented set of approaches for supporting individuals in their vaccine decisions. However, the evidence around the measurable impact of various educational strategies to improve vaccine confidence is limited. We conducted a scoping review with the aim of exploring and characterizing educational interventions delivered during the pandemic to support COVID‐19 vaccine confidence in adults. Methods We developed a search strategy with a medical information scientist and searched five databases, including Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science, as well as grey literature. We considered all study designs and reports. Interventions delivered to children or adolescents, interventions on non‐COVID‐19 vaccines, as well as national or mass vaccination campaigns without documented interaction(s) between facilitator(s) and a specific audience were excluded. Articles were independently screened by three reviewers. After screening 4602 titles and abstracts and 174 full‐text articles across two rounds of searches, 22 articles met our inclusion criteria. Ten additional studies were identified through hand searching. Data from included studies were charted and results were described narratively. Results We included 32 studies and synthesized their educational delivery structure, participants (i.e., facilitators and priority audience), and content. Formal, group‐based presentations were the most common type of educational intervention in the included studies (75%). A third of studies (34%) used multiple strategies, with many formal group‐based presentations being coupled with additional individual‐based interventions (29%). Given the novelty of the COVID‐19 vaccines and the unique current context, studies reported personalized conversations, question periods, and addressing misinformation as important components of the educational approaches reviewed. Conclusions Various educational interventions were delivered during the COVID‐19 pandemic, with many initiatives involving multifaceted interventions utilizing both formal and informal approaches that leveraged community (cultural, religious) partnerships when developing and facilitating COVID‐19 vaccine education. Train‐the‐trainer approaches with recognized community members could be of value as trust and personal connections were identified as strong enablers throughout the review.

Suggested Citation

  • Maya Murmann & Anna Cooper Reed & Mary Scott & Justin Presseau & Carrie Heer & Kathryn May & Amy Ramzy & Chau N. Huynh & Becky Skidmore & Vivian Welch & Julian Little & Kumanan Wilson & Melissa Brouwe, 2023. "Exploring COVID‐19 education to support vaccine confidence amongst the general adult population with special considerations for healthcare and long‐term care staff: A scoping review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:3:n:e1352
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1352
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth F Hunter & Kayla de la Haye & Jennifer M Murray & Jennifer Badham & Thomas W Valente & Mike Clarke & Frank Kee, 2019. "Social network interventions for health behaviours and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Liam Drew, 2022. "Did COVID vaccine mandates work? What the data say," Nature, Nature, vol. 607(7917), pages 22-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Stellefson & Samantha R. Paige & Beth H. Chaney & J. Don Chaney, 2020. "Evolving Role of Social Media in Health Promotion: Updated Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-7, February.
    2. Yiheng Wang & Felipe Navarro Nicoletti, 2023. "Entertainment Education and Citizens’ Participation in COVID-19 Pandemic Response: A Case Study of Chinese Citizens on Social Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Diana Tsoy & Danijela Godinic & Qingyan Tong & Bojan Obrenovic & Akmal Khudaykulov & Konstantin Kurpayanidi, 2022. "Impact of Social Media, Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) on the Intention to Stay at Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-32, June.
    4. Eisenberg, Marla E. & Wall, Melanie M. & Larson, Nicole & Arlinghaus, Katherine R. & Neumark-Sztainer, Dianne, 2021. "Do emerging adults know what their friends are doing and does it really matter? Methodologic challenges and associations of perceived and actual friend behaviors with emerging adults’ disordered eatin," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    5. McMillan, Cassie & Schaefer, David R., 2021. "Comparing targeting strategies for network-based adolescent drinking interventions: A simulation approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    6. Hiroyasu Inoue & Yohsuke Murase & Yasuyuki Todo, 2021. "Do economic effects of the anti-COVID-19 lockdowns in different regions interact through supply chains?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Tyler Prochnow & Christina Amo & Megan S. Patterson & Katie M. Heinrich, 2022. "I CrossFit; Do You? Cross-Sectional Peer Similarity of Physical Activity Behavior in a Group High Intensity Functional Training Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-9, April.
    8. Samuel F Rosenblatt & Jeffrey A Smith & G Robin Gauthier & Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, 2020. "Immunization strategies in networks with missing data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Sabina B. Gesell & Shari L. Barkin & Edward H. Ip & Santiago J. Saldana & Evan C. Sommer & Thomas W. Valente & Kayla de la Haye, 2021. "Leveraging Emergent Social Networks to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Low-Income Parents With Preschool-Aged Children," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    10. Sabina B. Gesell & Kayla de la Haye & Evan C. Sommer & Santiago J. Saldana & Shari L. Barkin & Edward H. Ip, 2020. "Identifying Social Network Conditions that Facilitate Sedentary Behavior Change: The Benefit of Being a “Bridge” in a Group-based Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    11. Yoshinori Fujiwara & Kumiko Nonaka & Masataka Kuraoka & Yoh Murayama & Sachiko Murayama & Yuta Nemoto & Motoki Tanaka & Hiroko Matsunaga & Koji Fujita & Hiroshi Murayama & Erika Kobayashi, 2022. "Influence of “Face-to-Face Contact” and “Non-Face-to-Face Contact” on the Subsequent Decline in Self-Rated Health and Mental Health Status of Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Japanese Adults: A Two-Year ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-10, February.
    12. Jennifer M. Murray & Sharon C. Sánchez-Franco & Olga L. Sarmiento & Erik O. Kimbrough & Christopher Tate & Shannon C. Montgomery & Rajnish Kumar & Laura Dunne & Abhijit Ramalingam & Erin L. Krupka & F, 2023. "Selection homophily and peer influence for adolescents’ smoking and vaping norms and outcomes in high and middle-income settings," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-35, December.
    13. Cornelia Betsch & Philipp Schmid & Pierre Verger & Stephan Lewandowsky & Anna Soveri & Ralph Hertwig & Angelo Fasce & Dawn Holford & Paul Raeve & Arnaud Gagneur & Pia Vuolanto & Tiago Correia & Lara T, 2022. "A call for immediate action to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake to prepare for the third pandemic winter," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-6, December.
    14. Campbell Foubister & Esther M F van Sluijs & Anna Vignoles & Paul Wilkinson & Edward C F Wilson & Caroline H D Croxson & Helen Elizabeth Brown & Kirsten Corder, 2021. "The school policy, social, and physical environment and change in adolescent physical activity: An exploratory analysis using the LASSO," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Victor O. Akande & Timothy O. Fawehinmi & Robert A.C. Ruiter & Stef P.J. Kremers, 2021. "Healthy Dietary Choices and Physical Activity Participation in the Canadian Arctic: Understanding Nunavut Inuit Perspectives on the Barriers and Enablers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:3:n:e1352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.