IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/suvges/v28y2018i3p37-49n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Leading Sector and the Effect of the Economic Growth: A Case Study in Pakpak Bharat Regency, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Hutajulu Dinar Melani
  • Nasir M.

    (State University of Medan,Medan, Indonesia)

  • Arwansyah

    (University of Medan,Medan, Indonesia)

Abstract

Pakpak Bharat Regency is an area with the lowest Gross Regional Domestic Product and Income percapita from 33 regency/city in North Sumatera Province. Because of this problem, to be important to know how the base sectors can improve the economy of Pakpak Bharat Regency. In this research, the study aims: (1) To know the base sectors in the economy of Pakpak Bharat Regency (2) To know the sector clasification of Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) in Pakpak Bharat Regency (3) To know how the base sectors effect the Gross Regional Domestic Product of Pakpak Bharat Regency. The data used in this study is secondary data and readings related to research. The tests used in this study are Klassen Typology, Location Quotient, and Least Square test. The research finds that: (1) the economics of Pakpak Bharat Regency is divided into several quadrants, is advanced and rapidly growing sectors (Quadrant I), advanced but depressed sectors (Quadrant II), potential sector (Quadrant III), and lagging sector (Quadrant IV). (2) sectors classified as advanced sectors in Quadrant I and Quadrant II (amounting to 4 sectors) are basic sectors in Pakpak Bharat Regency with LQ>1. (3) there is a positive and significant influence between the base sector on the GRDP of Pakpak Bharat Regency.

Suggested Citation

  • Hutajulu Dinar Melani & Nasir M. & Arwansyah, 2018. "Analysis of the Leading Sector and the Effect of the Economic Growth: A Case Study in Pakpak Bharat Regency, Indonesia," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 37-49, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:suvges:v:28:y:2018:i:3:p:37-49:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/sues-2018-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2018-0014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/sues-2018-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCann, Philip, 2013. "Modern Urban and Regional Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199582006.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfredo Monte & Sara Moccia & Luca Pennacchio, 2022. "Regional entrepreneurship and innovation: historical roots and the impact on the growth of regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 451-473, January.
    2. Mitze, Timo & Strotebeck, Falk, 2017. "Modeling interregional research collaborations in German biotechnology using industry directory data: A quantitative social network analysis," MPRA Paper 83392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. L. V. Mel’nikova, 2019. "Theoretical Arguments versus Empirical Evidence in Strategic Planning," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 126-136, April.
    4. Gianni Carbonaro & Eugenio Leanza & Philip McCann & Francesca Medda, 2018. "Demographic Decline, Population Aging, and Modern Financial Approaches to Urban Policy," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(2), pages 210-232, March.
    5. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Compensation modes of border effects in cross‐border regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 759-785, September.
    6. Emmanouil Tranos & Yannis Ioannides, 2015. "Ubiquitous digital technologies and spatial structure: a preliminary analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1329, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissensintensive Unternehmensdienste, Wissens-Spillovers und regionales Wachstum. Teilprojekt 1: Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung – Welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert das Wach," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58342, April.
    8. Philip McCann, 2017. "Urban futures, population ageing and demographic decline," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 543-557.
    9. Arthur Grimes & Valente J Matlaba & Jacques Poot, 2017. "Spatial impacts of the creation of Brasília: A natural experiment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 784-800, April.
    10. Grimes, Arthur & Tarrant, Nicholas, 2013. "A New Zealand Urban Population Database," Working Papers 13_07, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    11. Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2020. "Regional Economics—Fundamental Concepts, Policies and Institutions ‐ by Iwan J. Azis," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 34(2), pages 175-177, November.
    12. Arthur Grimes & Eyal Apatov & Larissa Lutchman & Anna Robinson, 2014. "Infrastructure’s Long-Lived Impact on Urban Development: Theory and Empirics," Working Papers 14_11, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    13. Elisabeth Bublitz & Michael Fritsch & Michael Wyrwich, 2015. "Balanced Skills and the City: An Analysis of the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Skill Balance, Thickness, and Innovation," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 91(4), pages 475-508, October.
    14. Lengyel, Imre & Lengyel, Balázs & Vas, Zsófia & Szakálné Kanó, Izabella, 2016. "Az újraiparosodás térbeli kérdőjelei Magyarországon [Territorial questions of reindustrialization in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 615-646.
    15. Maureen B. M. Lankhuizen & Thomas De Graaff & Henri L. F. de Groot, 2015. "Product Heterogeneity, Intangible Barriers and Distance Decay: The Effect of Multiple Dimensions of Distance on Trade across Different Product Categories," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 137-159, June.
    16. Silvia Rocchetta & Martina Iori & Andrea Mina & Robert Gillanders, 2023. "Technological diversification and the growth of regions in the short and long run," LEM Papers Series 2023/46, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    17. Xing Gao & Keyu Zhai, 2021. "Spatial Mechanisms of Regional Innovation Mobility in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 247-270, July.
    18. Lu Zhang & Hongfei Yu & Zhongfa Zhou & Fangxin Yi & Dong Li, 2023. "National Big Data Experimental Area and the Unexpected Booming of the Housing Price in Guiyang of Guizhou Province of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Jérôme Vicente, 2014. "“Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water”. Network failures and policy challenges for cluster long run dynamics," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1420, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2014.
    20. Kamila Turečková & Stanislav Martinát & Jan Nevima & František Varadzin, 2022. "The Impact of Brownfields on Residential Property Values in Post-Industrial Communities: A Study from the Eastern Part of the Czech Republic," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:suvges:v:28:y:2018:i:3:p:37-49:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.