IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/reoecp/v18y2018i4p387-407n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selected Issues from the Dark Side of the General Data Protection Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Cvik Eva Daniela

    (Czech University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Law,Kamýcká, Prague - Suchdol,Kamýcká, Czech Rebublic)

  • Pelikánová Radka MacGregor

    (University of West Bohemia, of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Faculty of Law, Department of Business Law, Sady Pětatřicátníků,Pilsen, Czech Republic)

  • Malý Michal

    (Czech University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Management, Department od Economics, Kamýcká,Prague, Czech Rebublic)

Abstract

The Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of personal data (GDPR) was enacted in 2016 and applies from 25thMay 2018 in the entire EU. The GDPR is a product of an ambitious reform and represents a direct penetration of the EU law into the legal systems of the EU member states. The EU works on the enhancement of awareness about the GDPR and points out its bright side. However, the GDPR has its dark side as well, which will inevitably have a negative impact. Hence, the goal of this paper is twofold - (i) to scientifically identify, forecast, and analyze selected problematic aspects of the GDPR and its implementation, in particular for Czech municipalities, and (ii) to propose recommendations about how to reduce, or even avoid, their negative impacts. These theoretic analyses are projected to a Czech case study focusing on municipalities, which offers fresh primary data and allows a further refining of the proposed recommendations. An integral part of the performed analyses is also a theoretic forecast of expenses linked to the GDPR, which municipalities will have to include in their mandatory expenses and mid-term prognostic expectations regarding the impact on the budgets of these municipalities from Central Bohemia. The GDPR, like Charon, is at the crossing, the capacity and knowledge regarding its application is critical for operating in the EU in 2018. It is time both to admit that the GDPR has its dark side and to present real and practical recommendations about how to mitigate it.

Suggested Citation

  • Cvik Eva Daniela & Pelikánová Radka MacGregor & Malý Michal, 2018. "Selected Issues from the Dark Side of the General Data Protection Regulation," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 18(4), pages 387-407, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:18:y:2018:i:4:p:387-407:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/revecp-2018-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2018-0020
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/revecp-2018-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David, Paul A. & Hall, Bronwyn H. & Toole, Andrew A., 2000. "Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 497-529, April.
    2. Adam P. Balcerzak, 2016. "Technological Potential of European Economy," Working Papers 33/2016, Institute of Economic Research, revised Sep 2016.
    3. Adam P. Balcerzak, 2016. "Technological Potential of European Economy. Proposition of Measurement with Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 12(3), pages 7-17.
    4. Vokoun Marek, 2017. "Characteristics of the innovation activities of firms in Europe: a critical review of international differences," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 17(3), pages 239-262, September.
    5. Anna Piekarczyk, 2016. "Contemporary Organization And A Perspective On Integration And Development," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 7(3), pages 467-483, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tahal Radek & Formánek Tomáš, 2020. "Reflection of GDPR by the Czech Population," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 78-94, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Eva Daniela Cvik, 2018. "Impact of GDPR Security Measures on the Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 66(6), pages 1535-1542.
    2. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility Information in Annual Reports in the EU—A Czech Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Robert K. MacGregor, 2020. "The EU Puzzling CSR Regime and the Confused Perception by Ambassadors of Luxury Fashion Businesses: A Case Study from Pařížská," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(3), pages 74-108.
    4. Robert K. MacGregor & Radka MacGregor Pelikánova, 2019. "Shareholder Engagement for Corporate Governance in the Light of the Harmonization and Transposition," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 22-34.
    5. Cvik Eva Daniela & Pelikánová Radka Macgregor, 2019. "The (MIS)Compliance of Objectives of New Cap – Legislative, Academic and General Public Perspectives," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 143-161, March.
    6. Eleni Laitsou & Antonios Kargas & Dimitris Varoutas, 2020. "Digital Competitiveness in the European Union Era: The Greek Case," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-33, October.
    7. Agnieszka Malkowska & Maria Urbaniec & Malgorzata Kosala, 2021. "The impact of digital transformation on European countries: insights from a comparative analysis," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(2), pages 325-355, June.
    8. Ryszard Borowiecki & Barbara Siuta-Tokarska & Jolanta Maroń & Marcin Suder & Agnieszka Thier & Katarzyna Żmija, 2021. "Developing Digital Economy and Society in the Light of the Issue of Digital Convergence of the Markets in the European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Eva Daniela Cvik & Robert MacGregor, 2019. "Qualified Electronic Signature - eIDAS Striking Czech Public Sector Bodies," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(6), pages 1551-1560.
    10. Kenyon MacGregor Robert & MacGregor Pelikánová Radka, 2019. "The nature and meaning of the Directive 2013/34/EU on financial statements according to the CJ EU," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 6(53), pages 246-261, January.
    11. Radka MacGregor Pelikánová & Tereza Němečková & Robert K. MacGregor, 2021. "CSR Statements in International and Czech Luxury Fashion Industry at the Onset and during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Slowing Down the Fast Fashion Business?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Heijs, Joost, 2003. "Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: the case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 445-461, March.
    13. Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich & Günther, Jutta & Loose, Brigitte & Ludwig, Udo & Nulsch, Nicole, 2015. "Can R&D subsidies counteract the economic crisis? – Macroeconomic effects in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 623-633.
    14. Ali-Yrkkö, Jyrki, 2004. "Impact of Public R&D Financing on Private R&D - Does Financial Constraint Matter?," Discussion Papers 943, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    15. Lamberova, Natalia, 2021. "The puzzling politics of R&D: Signaling competence through risky projects," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 801-818.
    16. E. C. Mamatzakis, 2010. "The contribution of the publicly-funded R&D capital to productivity growth and an application to the Greek food and beverages industry," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 483-494.
    17. Aiello, Francesco & Albanese, Giuseppe & Piselli, Paolo, 2019. "Good value for public money? The case of R&D policy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1057-1076.
    18. Sergio Afcha & Jose García-Quevedo, 2016. "The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(6), pages 955-975.
    19. Dominique Guellec & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, 2003. "The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 225-243.
    20. Tommaso Pucci & Mara Brumana & Tommaso Minola & Lorenzo Zanni, 2020. "Social capital and innovation in a life science cluster: the role of proximity and family involvement," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 205-227, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:18:y:2018:i:4:p:387-407:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.