IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ngooec/v65y2019i2p30-40n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Environment: Recovery and Resolution Regimes as the Pillar of the Banking Union

Author

Listed:
  • Festić Mejra

    (University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business, Slovenia)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to present the possible regimes of bank resolution in the euro system and to highlight open questions concerning additional capital buffers and the valuation of assets according to the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD). The bail-in tool is used to write down or to convert certain liabilities with the purpose of restoring the capital adequacy. The valuation exercise would determine the amount of loss absorbtion to restore viability of the institution and capital adequacy. The bridge bank tool offers deeper restructuring powers to the competent resolution authority. Sale of the business tool is actually a variation of the bridge bank tool, enabling the resolution authority to transfer assets and liabilities to investors. The asset separation tool always is combined with another tool. The write-down is not a resolution tool, as it affects equity, while a bail-in tool goes further to other subordinated debt and senior debt. It is possible to establish additional resolution tools in the national legislation, as long as these tools are compatible with the principles of directive and national legislation in order to support cross-border group resolution. The issue of bank overregulation and the ability to meet the requirements without negative effects on the economy is emphasized.

Suggested Citation

  • Festić Mejra, 2019. "International Environment: Recovery and Resolution Regimes as the Pillar of the Banking Union," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 65(2), pages 30-40, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ngooec:v:65:y:2019:i:2:p:30-40:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/ngoe-2019-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2019-0009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ngoe-2019-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas M. Hoenig & Charles S. Morris, 2013. "Restructuring the Banking System to Improve Safety and Soundness," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Viral V Acharya & Thorsten Beck & Douglas D Evanoff & George G Kaufman & Richard Portes (ed.), The Social Value of the Financial Sector Too Big to Fail or Just Too Big?, chapter 21, pages 401-425, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Mr. Stijn Claessens & Ms. Laura E. Kodres, 2014. "The Regulatory Responses to the Global Financial Crisis: Some Uncomfortable Questions," IMF Working Papers 2014/046, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Avgouleas, Emilios & Goodhart, Charles & Schoenmaker, Dirk, 2013. "Bank Resolution Plans as a catalyst for global financial reform," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 210-218.
    4. Simona E. Cociuba & Malik Shukayev & Alexander Ueberfeldt, 2019. "Managing Risk Taking With Interest Rate Policy And Macroprudential Regulations," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(2), pages 1056-1081, April.
    5. Martin F. Hellwig, 2018. "Valuation reports in the context of banking resolution: What are the challenges?," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2018_06, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    6. Mikael Petitjean, 2013. "Bank failures and regulation: a critical review," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 16-38, February.
    7. Claire L. McGuire, 2012. "Simple Tools to Assist in the Resolution of Troubled Banks," World Bank Publications - Reports 12342, The World Bank Group.
    8. Valiante, Diego, 2016. "Harmonising Insolvency Laws in the Euro Area: Rationale, stocktaking and challenges," CEPS Papers 12024, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    9. Silvia Merler, 2018. "Bank liquidation in the European Union- clarification needed," Policy Contributions 23603, Bruegel.
    10. Emilios Avgouleas & Charles Goodhart, 2015. "Critical Reflections on Bank Bail-ins," Journal of Financial Regulation, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 3-29.
    11. Anat R. Admati & Peter M. DeMarzo & Martin F. Hellwig & Paul Pfleiderer, 2010. "Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts, and Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulation: Why Bank Equity is Not Expensive," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2010_42, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    12. Martin Hellwig, 2017. "Carving out legacy assets: a successful tool for bank restructuring?," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2017_03, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    13. Micossi, Stefano & Bruzzone, Ginevra & Cassella, Miriam, 2014. "Bail-in Provisions in State Aid and Resolution Procedures: Are they consistent with systemic stability?," CEPS Papers 9279, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia M. Buch & Benjamin Weigert, 2019. "Macroprudential policy in a currency union," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 155(1), pages 23-33, February.
    2. Mr. Itai Agur & Mr. Sunil Sharma, 2013. "Rules, Discretion, and Macro-Prudential Policy," IMF Working Papers 2013/065, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Diamond, D.W. & Kashyap, A.K., 2016. "Liquidity Requirements, Liquidity Choice, and Financial Stability," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & Harald Uhlig (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 2263-2303, Elsevier.
    4. Vittoria Cerasi & Stefano Montoli, 2020. "Bank resolution and multinational banks," Working Papers 447, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2020.
    5. Maurizio Trapanese, 2021. "The economics of non-bank financial intermediation: why do we need to fill the regulation gap?," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 625, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    6. Denis Gorea & Oleksiy Kryvtsov & Tamon Takamura, 2016. "Leaning Within a Flexible Inflation-Targeting Framework: Review of Costs and Benefits," Discussion Papers 16-17, Bank of Canada.
    7. Paolo Angelini & Laurent Clerc & Vasco Cúrdia & Leonardo Gambacorta & Andrea Gerali & Alberto Locarno & Roberto Motto & Werner Roeger & Skander Van den Heuvel & Jan Vlček, 2015. "Basel III: Long-term Impact on Economic Performance and Fluctuations," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 83(2), pages 217-251, March.
    8. Benjamin M Tabak & Dimas M Fazio & Regis A Ely & Joao M. T. Amaral & Daniel O Cajueiro, 2017. "The effects of capital buffers on profitability: An empirical study," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1468-1473.
    9. Bernard M. Hoekman & Petros C. Mavroidis, 2015. "A Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement for Services?," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/25, European University Institute.
    10. Martínez, Juan Francisco & Oda, Daniel, 2021. "Characterization of the Chilean financial cycle, early warning indicators and implications for macro-prudential policies," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 2(1).
    11. Dominika Ehrenbergerová & Martin Hodula & Zuzana Gric, 2022. "Does capital-based regulation affect bank pricing policy?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 135-167, April.
    12. Schnabel, Isabel & Weder di Mauro, Beatrice & Schäfer, Alexander, 2016. "Bail-in Expectations for European Banks: Actions Speak Louder than Words," CEPR Discussion Papers 11061, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Marco Migueis, 2017. "Forward-looking and Incentive-compatible Operational Risk Capital Framework," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-087, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    14. Darracq Pariès, Matthieu & Körner, Jenny & Papadopoulou, Niki, 2019. "Empowering central bank asset purchases: The role of financial policies," Working Paper Series 2237, European Central Bank.
    15. Maurizio Trapanese & Sabrina Bellacci & Marcello Bofondi & Giuseppe DE Martino & Sebastiano Laviola & Valerio Vacca, 2023. "The interplay between large banks' prudential and resolution frameworks: do we need further improvements?," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 807, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    16. Bernd Rudolph, 2013. "Contingent Convertibles (CoCo-Bonds) als Bail-in-Instrumente für Banken," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(67), pages 97-122, January.
    17. Phillip Keefer & Carlos Scartascini, 2022. "Organization, Citizenship, and the Social Contract," IDB Publications (Book Chapters), in: Phillip Keefer & Carlos Scartascini (ed.), Trust: The Key to Social Cohesion and Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean, edition 1, chapter 8, pages 195-222, Inter-American Development Bank.
    18. Md Shah Naoaj & Mir Md Moyazzem Hosen, 2023. "Does higher capital maintenance drive up banks cost of equity? Evidence from Bangladesh," Papers 2302.02762, arXiv.org.
    19. Antoine Martin & David Skeie & Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden, 2014. "Repo Runs," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(4), pages 957-989.
    20. Daniel Detzer, 2012. "New instruments for banking regulation and monetary policy after the crisis," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 233-254.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    recovery and resolution regimes; bridge bank; sale of business; asset separation tool; bail-in; regulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E50 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - General
    • E59 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Other
    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • E6 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ngooec:v:65:y:2019:i:2:p:30-40:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.