IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/hjobpa/v14y2023i2p137-147n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple Streams Approach and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Compared and Contrasted

Author

Listed:
  • Spano Dominick

    (1 Florida Atlantic University, Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, Florida, 33431, USA)

Abstract

Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach (MSA) and Jones and Baumgartner’s Punctuated Equilibrium Theory (PET) are public policy frameworks that have existed for many years. Given their long-term popularity, it is important for readers to have a strong working knowledge on how said frameworks function, and be able to compare and contrast them. It has also been put forth that PET only serves as an updated version of MSA, but this paper argues that said assertion is inaccurate, as PET is a useful framework in its own right. By inspecting this paper, readers will learn about MSA, PET, how they are similar and different, how they can be operationalized or used in real life circumstances, how they have been tested, and it is ultimately concluded that PET is not just a reworking of MSA.

Suggested Citation

  • Spano Dominick, 2023. "Multiple Streams Approach and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Compared and Contrasted," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 137-147, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:hjobpa:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:137-147:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/hjbpa-2023-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2023-0020
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/hjbpa-2023-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott E. Robinson & Floun'say Caver & Kenneth J. Meier & Laurence J. O'Toole, 2007. "Explaining Policy Punctuations: Bureaucratization and Budget Change," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(1), pages 140-150, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francois K. Doamekpor & Julia Beckett, 2015. "Federal Economic Development Transfers to State and Local Governments," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(1), pages 49-64, February.
    2. Darryl S.L. Jarvis & Alex Jingwei He, 2020. "Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Who, how, and why?," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1), pages 3-10, February.
    3. Tao Peng & Tom Christensen & Liu Yihong & Chu Chun, 2024. "Power Structure, Issue Priorities and Attention Dynamics of Leaders from 2001 to 2017 in China," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 351-368, March.
    4. Louis-Robert Beaulieu-Guay & Maria Alejandra Costa & Éric Montpetit, 2023. "Policy change and information search: a test of the politics of information using regulatory data," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 377-418, June.
    5. Laudari, Hari Krishna & Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek, 2020. "A postmortem of forest policy dynamics of Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Travis Sharp, 2019. "Wars, presidents, and punctuated equilibriums in US defense spending," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(3), pages 367-396, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:hjobpa:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:137-147:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.