IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eaiada/v26y2022i3p1-20n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pet Goods Consumption in Polish Households

Author

Listed:
  • Gromek Natalia

    (Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, Warsaw, Poland)

  • Perek-Białas Jolanta

    (Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

This paper expands the considerations of Becker’s and Leibenstein’s family theories with a focus on the additional member of the household (pet/animal) in the analysis of consumption. It is the first analytical approach regarding pet goods consumption with references to microeconomic theories based on Polish data. The study analyses the households’ characteristics that have an impact on expenditure on pet goods. This article used the Polish Household Budget Surveys for 2018. The findings from the logistic regression models suggest that the household’s socio-economic group, place of living, children in household and whether the household rents the flat/accommodation impact on determining the probability of owning a pet among Polish house-holds; analyses of interactions between significant variables were also conducted. However, the human-animal bond could not be included in analysis, which is a limitation, the overall work is pioneering, as it shows the quantitative approach to household economy that highlights the need to elaborate the economic family theories of Becker and Leibenstein by a new family member – a pet.

Suggested Citation

  • Gromek Natalia & Perek-Białas Jolanta, 2022. "Pet Goods Consumption in Polish Households," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 26(3), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eaiada:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:1-20:n:2
    DOI: 10.15611/eada.2022.3.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15611/eada.2022.3.01
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15611/eada.2022.3.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schwarz Peter M & Troyer Jennifer L & Walker Jennifer Beck, 2007. "Animal House: Economics of Pets and the Household," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Ellson, Tony, 2008. "Can we live without a dog? Consumption life cycles in dog-owner relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 565-573, May.
    3. Emma R. Power, 2017. "Renting with pets: a pathway to housing insecurity?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 336-360, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. Gromek & J. Perek-Białas, 2022. "Why is pet goods consumption imperceptible for economists? A scoping review," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Samuel Cameron & Mark Fox, 2011. "Half Full or Half Empty: The Economics of Work–Life Balance," Chapters, in: Samuel Cameron (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Leisure, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Maalsen, Sophia & Wolifson, Peta & Rogers, Dallas & Nelson, Jacqueline & Buckle, Caitlin, 2021. "Understanding discrimination effects in private rental housing," SocArXiv jdycg, Center for Open Science.
    4. Coate Stephen & Knight Brian, 2010. "Pet Overpopulation: An Economic Analysis," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-59, December.
    5. Hobbs, Lonnie & Shanoyan, Aleksan & Hovhannisyan, Vardges & Aldrich, Greg, 2023. "Assessment of Pet Food Demand Structure: Implications for Agribusiness Management and Marketing Strategies," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335994, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Zhenguo Lin & Marcus Allen & Charles Carter, 2013. "Pet Policy and Housing Prices: Evidence from the Condominium Market," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 109-122, July.
    7. Kirk, Colleen P., 2019. "Dogs have masters, cats have staff: Consumers' psychological ownership and their economic valuation of pets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 306-318.
    8. Samuel Cameron, 2011. "Overview of the Economics of Leisure," Chapters, in: Samuel Cameron (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Leisure, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Hulse, Kath & Martin, Chris & James, Amity & Stone, Wendy & Hayward, Richard Donald, 2018. "Private rental in transition: institutional change, technology and innovation in Australia," SocArXiv yqbxj, Center for Open Science.
    10. Megehee, Carol, 2008. "Can we live without cats? Interpreting and expanding on Ellson's question from a cat-lover's perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 574-578, May.
    11. Huang, Donna & Stone, Wendy & Power, Emma & Tually, Selina & James, Amity & Faulkner, Debbie & Goodall, Zoë & Buckle, Caitlin, 2021. "Housing and housing assistance pathways with companion animals: risks, costs, benefits and opportunities," SocArXiv ymkqj, Center for Open Science.
    12. Grossbard, Shoshana, 2010. "Independent Individual Decision-Makers in Household Models and the New Home Economics," IZA Discussion Papers 5138, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Shelby E. McDonald & Camie A. Tomlinson & Jennifer W. Applebaum & Sara W. Moyer & Samantha M. Brown & Sue Carter & Patricia A. Kinser, 2021. "Human–Animal Interaction and Perinatal Mental Health: A Narrative Review of Selected Literature and Call for Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-26, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    pet ownership; consumption expenditures; economics of the household;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D19 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Other
    • J19 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Other
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eaiada:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:1-20:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.