IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/crebss/v7y2021i1p31-42n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business and Economics Students’ Self-Reports on Academic Reading in English as L2: A Factor Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sladoljev-Agejev Tamara

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Kolić-Vehovec Svjetlana

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Jazbec Anamarija

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Adequate reading behaviour is vital for text comprehension across fields. In today’s professional environment, a well-developed reading skill is also expected in English as a second language (EL2), which happens already in college, although transition to college-level reading may be difficult even in the first language. It is therefore useful to analyse students’ use of reading strategies to facilitate their academic progress. This study investigates the reading behaviour of junior students of business/economics when reading academic texts in EL2. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis (N=134) of a 45-item questionnaire about students’ awareness of reading strategies and their reading confidence (i.e. self-perceived competence in text retelling). The majority of the items were based on self-reports found in the literature (Kolić-Vehovec, Bajšanski, 2001; Mokhtari, Reichard, 2002; Taraban, Kerr, Rynearson, 2004) and several items were added to the questionnaire (e.g. questions related to note taking). Five factors were interpretable: four factors related to Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies (Repeated Reading, Monitoring/Regulation, Note Taking and Elaboration) and the fifth factor covering self-perceived competence in text retelling (Reading Confidence). Internal consistency of the factors indicated by standardized Cronbach’s alphas were 0.83 (Repeated Reading), 0.80 (Monitoring and Regulation), 0.77 (Note Taking), 0.63 (Elaboration) and 0.75 (Reading Confidence). Three strategies positively correlated with each other (Repeated Reading, Monitoring/Regulation and Elaboration), while negative correlation was found between Note Taking and Reading Confidence. The results provide valuable information on the patterns in student reading as a baseline for further analysis of L2 text comprehension in college.

Suggested Citation

  • Sladoljev-Agejev Tamara & Kolić-Vehovec Svjetlana & Jazbec Anamarija, 2021. "Business and Economics Students’ Self-Reports on Academic Reading in English as L2: A Factor Analysis," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 31-42, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:crebss:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:31-42:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/crebss-2021-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/crebss-2021-0003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/crebss-2021-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    business students; factor analysis; metacognitive awareness; reading strategies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:crebss:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:31-42:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.