IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/voj/journl/v66y2019i5p633-657id453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Now versus Human Over Time. When Instrumental Rationality and Utility are not Enough

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksander Ostapiuk

Abstract

The goal of this article is to show that instrumental rationality and utility that have been used in economics for many years does not work well. What is presented in the article is how significant the influence of utilitarianism has been on economics and why the economists get rid of humans’ goals and motivations. It is shown in the article that the human who decides in present is absolutely different from the human who decides over time. Many economists neglected this problem because they wanted to have an effective and simple model. Becker’s economic method is presented as a dead end to which economics has been brought to. It is impossible to connect different selves of one human being by using the utility measure. The works of Schelling and J.S. Mill are used to explain this impossibility. The conclusion of this article is that instrumental rationality and utility have affected economics significantly. But, this simplified view on human nature is no longer valid. Hence, economics needs to think not only about the means but also about the human goals. Economics needs to rebuff relativism and show people how to achieve well-being. If we want to help people with their self-governance, we will have to choose reason over emotions. Key words: Instrumental rationality, Utilitarianism, Choice over time, Multiple selves, Wellbeing.JEL: B00, B4, B5, D91. Čovek sada i čovek kroz vreme. Kad instrumentalna racionalnost i korisnost nisu dovoljni Cilj rada je da pokaže da instrumentalna racionalnost i korisnost koji se u ekonomiji koriste već duži niz godina ne funkcionišu dobro. Ono što je predstavljeno u radu je nivo uticaja utilitarizma na ekonomiju i zašto se ekonomisti oslobađaju ljudskih ciljeva i motivacije. U radu je pokazano da se čovek koji donosi odluku za sada apsolutno razlikuje od čoveka koji donosi odluku kroz vreme. Mnogi ekonomisti su zanemarili ovaj problem jer su želeli da imaju efikasan i jednostavan model. Bekerova ekonomska metoda predstavljena je kao slepa ulica do kojeg je ekonomija dovedena. Nemoguće je povezati različite osobine jednog čoveka korišćenjem mere korisnosti. Radovi Šelinga i Mila se koriste za objašnjenje ove nemogućnosti. Zaključak rada je da su instrumentalna racionalnost i korisnost značajno uticali na ekonomiju. Ali, ovo pojednostavljeno gledište na ljudsku prirodu više nije validno. Dakle, ekonomija mora razmišljati ne samo o sredstvima već i o ljudskim ciljevima. Ekonomija treba da umanji relativizam i pokaže ljudima kako da postignu blagostanje. Ako želimo da pomognemo ljudima u njihovoj samoupravi, moraćemo da izaberemo razum naspram emocija. Ključne reči: Instrumentalna racionalnost, utilitarizam, izbor s vremenom, višestruke osobine, blagostanje.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksander Ostapiuk, 2019. "Human Now versus Human Over Time. When Instrumental Rationality and Utility are not Enough," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 66(5), pages 633-657.
  • Handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:66:y:2019:i:5:p:633-657:id:453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/article/view/453/569
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    instrumental rationality; choice over time; multiple selves; well-being; utilitarianism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B00 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General - - - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches
    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
    • B5 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:66:y:2019:i:5:p:633-657:id:453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivana Horvat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.