IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vls/rojfme/v1y2014i1p203-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge, Economic Models And Market Value Of Companies

Author

Listed:
  • IANCU, Eugenia

    (Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania)

  • SOCACIU, Tiberiu

    (Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

The direction of our research aims in essence, to propose and build some modern systems (based on decision expert systems decision, neural networks, etc.) to estimate the risk of bankruptcy of enterprises, considering the economic models already known. Made simpler, we propose that certain non-quantifiable components of the value of the business of an organization (the knowledge held, the amount of management applied, etc) to be captured and / or included in the structure of economic models aimed at predicting the risk of bankruptcy of companies. The basic idea of the research focuses on the synthetic analysis regarding the risk of bankruptcy of firms in terms of current realities that characterize the competitive environment of businesses at a global level. Today, the knowledge society and / or the knowledge economy has become a kind of vector of reporting for both business organizations and policy makers, opinion leaders and even every citizen. The so-called intangible assets of a company determine in an increasingly measure the market value of the firm but instead they are not reflected or very little reflected in the accounts entity. Acquisition and processing of new knowledge, while organizational learning have now become major directions of action for all business organizations. New knowledge are transformed by trained / qualified employees in inventions and innovations of various types that subsequently value in all markets. Otherwise, knowledge has become today an essential resource for companies, but including this asset in the structure of accounting indicators reflects major difficulties under methodological report.

Suggested Citation

  • IANCU, Eugenia & SOCACIU, Tiberiu, 2014. "Knowledge, Economic Models And Market Value Of Companies," Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics, Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 1(1), pages 203-209.
  • Handle: RePEc:vls:rojfme:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:203-209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.icfm.ro/RePEc/vls/vls_pdf_jfme/vol1i1p203-209.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iancu Eugenia & Pa?cu Paul & Morariu Nicolae, 2014. "Knowledge and the Concept of Knowledge Society," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 333-337, May.
    2. Claire McInerney, 2002. "Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(12), pages 1009-1018, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Alonzo, 2022. "Organizational Values and Knowledge Sharing in Public Institution: Economic-Public Sector in Guatemala," Digital Transformation: The Harmonic Convergence of People, Culture, Process, and Technology in the New Normal,, ToKnowPress.
    2. Iwona Dudek & Jean-Yves Blaise, 2017. "What Comes before a Digital Output? Eliciting and Documenting Cultural Heritage Research Processes," Post-Print halshs-01673865, HAL.
    3. Bibi Alajmi & Talal Alhaji, 2018. "Mapping the Field of Knowledge Management: Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Journal of Information & Knowledge Management for the Period from 2002–2016," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    5. Ghabban, Fahad & Selamat, Ali & Ibrahim, Roliana, 2018. "New model for encouraging academic staff in Saudi universities to use IT for knowledge sharing to improve scholarly publication performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 92-99.
    6. Swapnil Dhamal & Y. Narahari, 2015. "Formation of Stable Strategic Networks with Desired Topologies," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 3(2), pages 158-213, December.
    7. Joon Hyung Cho & So Young Sohn, 0. "Competing risk model for predicting stabilization period of university spin-off ventures," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    8. Barão, Alexandre & de Vasconcelos, José Braga & Rocha, Álvaro & Pereira, Ruben, 2017. "A knowledge management approach to capture organizational learning networks," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 735-740.
    9. D. Mehta & Naveen K Mehta & Jitendra K. Sharma, 2011. "Knowledge Management in Economic Downturn: Indian Scenario," BRAND. Broad Research in Accounting, Negotiation, and Distribution, EduSoft Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 16-21, October.
    10. Jankit Chotigo & Yasuo Kadono, 2021. "Were There Any Key Factors That Encourage Food Delivery Apps Adoption before the Covid-19 Pandemic in Thailand," Economy for a New Normal: Digitalisation and Human Relations in Business and Education,, ToKnowPress.
    11. Hugo Pinto & Jorge André Guerreiro & Manuel Fernández-Esquinas, 2023. "Sources of knowledge in the firm: a review on influential, internal and contextual factors in innovation dynamics," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, February.
    12. Yang Cai & Youming Song & Xia Xiao & Wendian Shi, 2020. "The Effect of Social Capital on Tacit Knowledge-Sharing Intention: The Mediating Role of Employee Vigor," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    13. Patient Rambe & Mpho Agnes Mbeo, 2017. "Technology-Enhanced Knowledge Management Framework for Retaining Research Knowledge among University Academics," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 9(1), pages 189-206.
    14. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk & Neitzert, Thomas, 2018. "Implementing lean—Outcomes from SME case studies," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 94-104.
    15. Joon Hyung Cho & So Young Sohn, 2017. "Competing risk model for predicting stabilization period of university spin-off ventures," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 777-796, September.
    16. Yinian Gu, 2004. "Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 61(2), pages 171-190, October.
    17. Antony Pearce & Dirk Pons & Thomas Neitzert, 2023. "Understanding Lean—Statistical Analysis of Perceptions and Self-Deception Regarding Lean Management," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-43, June.
    18. Zihanxin Li & Ting Wan & Jing Lan, 2022. "Substitution or Complementarity: Influence of Industry–University–Research-Institute Cooperation Governance Mechanism on Knowledge Transfer—An Empirical Analysis from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Roxanne Helm Stevens & Joshua Millage & Sondra Clark, 2010. "Waves of Knowledge Management: The Flow between Explicit and Tacit Knowledge," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 2(1), pages 129-135, March.
    20. Bibi M. Alajmi & Laila N. Marouf & Abdus Sattar Chaudhry, 2016. "Knowledge Management for Healthcare: Investigating Practices that Drive Performance," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    knowledge classes; bankruptcy risk; knowledge; innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • M29 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vls:rojfme:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:203-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Mateescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cfiarro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.