IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v55y2020i1p76-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does School Accountability Affect Teachers?: Evidence from New York City

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Dizon-Ross

Abstract

Does holding schools accountable for student performance cause good teachers to leave low-performing schools? Using data from New York City, which assigns accountability grades to schools on the basis of student achievement, I perform a regression discontinuity analysis and find evidence of the opposite effect. At the bottom end of the school grade distribution, lower accountability grades decrease teacher turnover and increase joining teachers’ quality. A likely channel is that accountability pressures increase principal effort at lower-graded schools, which teachers value. In contrast, at the top end of the school grade distribution, low accountability grades may negatively impact joining teachers’ quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Dizon-Ross, 2020. "How Does School Accountability Affect Teachers?: Evidence from New York City," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 55(1), pages 76-118.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:55:y:2020:i:1:p:76-118
    Note: DOI: 10.3368/jhr.55.1.1015.7438R1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jhr.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/55/1/76
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Bates & Michael Dinerstein & Andrew C. Johnston & Isaac Sorkin, 2022. "Teacher Labor Market Equilibrium and Student Achievement," CESifo Working Paper Series 9551, CESifo.
    2. Ellen Greaves & Iftikhar Hussain & Birgitta Rabe & Imran Rasul, 2023. "Parental Responses to Information about School Quality: Evidence from Linked Survey and Administrative Data," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(654), pages 2334-2402.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:55:y:2020:i:1:p:76-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.