IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/v24y1995i2p535-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decisions to Retain Attorneys and File Lawsuits: An Examination of the Comparative Negligence Rule in Accident Law

Author

Listed:
  • Low, Stuart
  • Smith, Janet Kiholm

Abstract

The article examines the impact on litigation behavior of a basic feature of tort reform - replacement of the standard of contributory negligence with comparative negligence. We focus on the differential impact of the two negligence standards on incentives to hire attorneys and litigate claims. The evidence is based on a large sample of auto injury accident claims during a period of considerable cross-state variation in liability rules. We find that, on average, comparative negligence provides stronger incentives to hire attorneys and file lawsuits and is associated with higher dollar awards. The average claimant in a contributory negligence state is predicted to have a 36.0 percent likelihood of obtaining representation compared to 47.3 percent in a comparative state. The joint probabilities of representation and filing are 12.5 percent in contributory negligence states versus 21.2 in comparative states. Other findings support the view that litigation is sometimes used as a variance-increasing strategy. Copyright 1995 by the University of Chicago.

Suggested Citation

  • Low, Stuart & Smith, Janet Kiholm, 1995. "Decisions to Retain Attorneys and File Lawsuits: An Examination of the Comparative Negligence Rule in Accident Law," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(2), pages 535-557, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:24:y:1995:i:2:p:535-57
    DOI: 10.1086/467968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467968
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/467968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci & Gerrit De Geest, 2005. "The Filtering Effect of Sharing Rules," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(1), pages 207-237, January.
    2. Sloan, Frank A & Stout, Emily M & Liang, Lan & Whetten-Goldstein, Kathryn, 2000. "Liability, Risk Perceptions, and Precautions at Bars," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(2), pages 473-501, October.
    3. Dagobert L. Brito & Peter R. Hartley, 1996. "Tort Law: Defects of the Comparative Negligence Standard," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 3(4), pages 449-458.
    4. Frenzen, Paul D. & Buzby, Jean C. & Rasco, Barbara, 2001. "Product Liability And Microbial Foodborne Illness," Agricultural Economic Reports 34059, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:24:y:1995:i:2:p:535-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.