IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/v28y1985i1p151-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Wealth Effects of Litigation by Targets: Do Interests Diverge in a Merge?

Author

Listed:
  • Jarrell, Gregg A

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarrell, Gregg A, 1985. "The Wealth Effects of Litigation by Targets: Do Interests Diverge in a Merge?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(1), pages 151-177, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:v:28:y:1985:i:1:p:151-77
    DOI: 10.1086/467078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467078
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/467078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard S. Ruback, 1988. "Do Target Shareholders Lose in Unsuccessful Control Contests?," NBER Chapters, in: Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences, pages 137-156, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Pearce II, John A. & Robinson, Richard Jr., 2004. "Hostile takeover defenses that maximize shareholder wealth," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 15-24.
    3. Jandik, Tomas & Makhija, Anil K., 2005. "Debt, debt structure and corporate performance after unsuccessful takeovers: evidence from targets that remain independent," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(5), pages 882-914, October.
    4. Guo, Jie (Michael) & Li, Lu & Hu, Nan & Wang, Xing, 2019. "Do managers keep their word? The disclosure of merger intention at pre-merger issuance and M&A performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 20-31.
    5. Poitras, Geoffrey, 1994. "Shareholder wealth maximization, business ethics and social responsibility," MPRA Paper 113221, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Jandik, Tomas & Makhija, Anil K., 2004. "Debt, Debt Structure and Corporate Performance after Unsuccessful Takeovers: Evidence from Targets that Remain Independent," Working Paper Series 2005-6, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.
    7. Krishnan, C.N.V. & Masulis, Ronald W. & Thomas, Randall S. & Thompson, Robert B., 2012. "Shareholder litigation in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 1248-1268.
    8. C. N. V. Krishnan & Ronald W. Masulis & Randall S. Thomas & Robert B. Thompson, 2014. "Jurisdictional Effects in M&A Litigation," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 132-158, March.
    9. Annette B. Poulsen & Gregg A. Jarrell, 1986. "Motivations For Hostile Tender Offers And The Market For Political Exchange," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 4(3), pages 30-45, July.
    10. Chung, Chune Young & Kim, Incheol & Rabarison, Monika K. & To, Thomas Y. & Wu, Eliza, 2020. "Shareholder litigation rights and corporate acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Peter H. Eddey & Roger S. Casey, 1989. "Directors' Recommendations in Response to Takeover Bids: Do They Act in Their Own Interests?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, June.
    12. Stefan Eichler & Dominik Maltritz, 2013. "An options-based approach to forecast competing bids: evidence for Canadian takeover battles," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(34), pages 4805-4819, December.
    13. Pardy, Robert, 1992. "Institutional reform in emerging securities markets," Policy Research Working Paper Series 907, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:v:28:y:1985:i:1:p:151-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.