IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucm/ijohet/v3y2016i2p170-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Los trasplantes institucionales en el campo del derecho. Una nueva perspectiva para la nueva economía institucional
[Institutional transplants in the field of Law. A new view for New Institutional Economics]

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Blanco Contreras

    (Universidad Rey Juan Carlos .)

Abstract

La Nueva Economía Institucional (NEI) comenzó recientemente a plantearse la utilidad de los trasplantes institucionales como medio para promover el crecimiento económico. Sin embargo, pronto se dieron cuenta de que estos trasplantes en general fallaban debido al problema del path dependence, que provocaba el choque de la institución formal trasplantada con las instituciones informales de la sociedad receptora. ¿Son estos trasplantes institucionales algo nuevo o, por el contrario, son un fenómeno importado de otra disciplina? En este artículo analizamos el origen de los trasplantes, aportando una visión enteramente jurídica del tema a través de los trabajos de los principales juristas que han estudiado esta materia en el campo del Derecho –especialmente dentro del Derecho comparado–.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Blanco Contreras, 2016. "Los trasplantes institucionales en el campo del derecho. Una nueva perspectiva para la nueva economía institucional [Institutional transplants in the field of Law. A new view for New Institutional ," Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Dpto. Historia e Instituciones Económicas I., vol. 3(2), pages 170-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucm:ijohet:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:170-187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/50204/1/16-3-2%28170-187%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Nueva Economía Institucional; Trasplantes institucionales; Path dependence; Derecho; Derecho comparado.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B5 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches
    • K0 - Law and Economics - - General
    • K3 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucm:ijohet:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:170-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Águeda González Abad (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feucmes.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.