IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tra/jlabre/v21y2000i3p489-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unionization and Nonunion Wage Patterns: Do Low-Wage Workers Gain the Most?

Author

Listed:
  • SUSAN M. DONOHUE
  • JOHN S. HEYWOOD

Abstract

A model of threat-induced nonunion wage supplements is developed in which worker support of unionization depends on both the relative wage between sectors and the likelihood of retaining employment after unionization. In contrast to previous models, the lowest wage workers no longer consistently receive the largest wage supplement. Samples of blue-collar workers and nonprofessional white-collar workers confirm that the lowest paid workers do not receive the largest wage supplements. Blue-collar male workers in the middle of the wage distribution receive the largest wage supplement, while blue-collar female workers at the top of the wage distribution receive the largest wage supplement.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan M. Donohue & John S. Heywood, 2000. "Unionization and Nonunion Wage Patterns: Do Low-Wage Workers Gain the Most? ," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 21(3), pages 489-502, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:21:y:2000:i:3:p:489-502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=6FF7N2LDPQP8W9JG
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madalozzo, Regina, 2002. "The Firm Size Wage Premium: A Quantile Analysis," Insper Working Papers wpe_17, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:21:y:2000:i:3:p:489-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110581 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.