IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v72y1990i2p356-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Scott-Type Regression Test of the Dividend Ratio Model

Author

Listed:
  • Shiller, Robert J

Abstract

Tests of a representation of the efficient markets model (the dividend-rtaio model of Campbell and Shiller (1988a)) of the stock market can be made by regressing (transformed) ex-post values on (transformed) actual values and testing whether the slope coefficient is one. Such tests are run here with some improvements. The results of the tests are that the efficient markets model is strongly rejected with U.S. data 1901-1987 in favor of an alternative that stock prices should have been much less volatile. Copyright 1990 by MIT Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiller, Robert J, 1990. "A Scott-Type Regression Test of the Dividend Ratio Model," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 72(2), pages 356-361, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:72:y:1990:i:2:p:356-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535%28199005%2972%3A2%3C356%3AASRTOT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-1&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Cashin & C. John McDermott, 2002. "Intertemporal Consumption Smoothing and Capital Mobility: Evidence from Australia," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 82-98, March.
    2. stanley c. w. salvary, 2005. "The Accounting Variable And Stock Price Determination," Finance 0502011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. A. Tegene & F. Kuchler, 1993. "A Regression Test Of The Present Value Model Of Us Farmland Prices," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 135-143, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:72:y:1990:i:2:p:356-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.