IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/techni/v4y2022i8p33-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability Analysis of State Building in Banjar District

Author

Listed:
  • Rahmah Sumantri

Abstract

According to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2002, it is stated that every building must meet administrative requirements and technical requirements by the function of the building. In addition, according to the Regulation of the Minister of Public Works No. 25 of 2007, it is stated that the building before being used/used must obtain a Function-worthy Certificate (SLF). As of 2022, the condition of state buildings in Banjar Regency has not yet passed the issuance of the Certificate of Feasibility of Function (SLF). This is due to the limited capacity of the Regional Government in the utilization, preservation, and demolition of buildings due to the limited regional budget. The approach used in this research is the quantitative method. The research stage begins by analyzing the level of reliability of state buildings in Banjar Regency (reliable, less reliable, and unreliable) where the components of the assessment consist of architecture, structure, utilities and fire protection, accessibility, and building and environmental planning. Next, analysis state buildings in Banjar Regency which are important are handled first based on a priority scale using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method from the results of filling out the questionnaire. The state building is used as a pilot project for the Regional Government so that appropriate recommendations for handling are formulated based on the results of the building reliability assessment. Based on the research, an analysis of the reliability level of the building has been successfully compiled, namely, for the DPRD Secretariat building of 78.34% (less reliable), the Development Planning, Research, and Regional Development Agency building of 78.38% (less reliable), Revenue Service Building Region by 77.61% (less reliable), Public Works Office Building, Spatial Planning and Land by 78.42% (less reliable), The Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency Building is 77.66% (less reliable), and the Health Service Building is 75.31% (less reliable). Based on the results of the analysis using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, it was found that state buildings are essential to be handled first based on a priority scale, namely the Health Office Building by 34%. To meet the reliability of buildings, the Health Office has made recommendations for maintenance, repair, restoration, overhaul/ demolition, and new replacement of building reliability components. Based on the results of the analysis using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, it was found that state buildings are essential to be handled first based on a priority scale, namely the Health Office Building by 34%. To meet the reliability of buildings, the Health Office has made recommendations for maintenance, repair, restoration, overhaul/ demolition, and new replacement of building reliability components. Based on the results of the analysis using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, it was found that state buildings are essential to be handled first based on a priority scale, namely the Health Office Building by 34%. To meet the reliability of buildings, the Health Office has made recommendations for maintenance, repair, restoration, overhaul/ demolition, and new replacement of building reliability components.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahmah Sumantri, 2022. "Reliability Analysis of State Building in Banjar District," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 4(8), pages 33-55.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:techni:v:4:y:2022:i:8:p:33-55
    DOI: doi.org/10.47577/technium.v4i8.7247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/technium/article/view/7247
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/technium/article/download/7247/2555
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/doi.org/10.47577/technium.v4i8.7247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Nan & Yang, Zheng & Becerik-Gerber, Burcin & Tang, Chao & Chen, Nanlin, 2015. "Why is the reliability of building simulation limited as a tool for evaluating energy conservation measures?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 196-205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nutkiewicz, Alex & Yang, Zheng & Jain, Rishee K., 2018. "Data-driven Urban Energy Simulation (DUE-S): A framework for integrating engineering simulation and machine learning methods in a multi-scale urban energy modeling workflow," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1176-1189.
    2. Amasyali, Kadir & El-Gohary, Nora M., 2018. "A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1192-1205.
    3. Glasgo, Brock & Hendrickson, Chris & Azevedo, Inês Lima, 2017. "Assessing the value of information in residential building simulation: Comparing simulated and actual building loads at the circuit level," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 348-363.
    4. Pedro Paulo Fernandes da Silva & Alberto Hernandez Neto & Ildo Luis Sauer, 2021. "Evaluation of Model Calibration Method for Simulation Performance of a Public Hospital in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Wang, Yuanhao, 2017. "Parametric study of passive design strategies for high-rise residential buildings in hot and humid climates: miscellaneous impact factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 442-460.
    6. Gourlis, Georgios & Kovacic, Iva, 2016. "A study on building performance analysis for energy retrofit of existing industrial facilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1389-1399.
    7. Javier Diaz-Valdivia & Flávio A. S. Fiorelli, 2023. "Computational Analysis of the Automation Strategies of Temperatures of Supplied Air, Chilled and Condensation Water in Commercial Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Kim, Yang-Seon & Heidarinejad, Mohammad & Dahlhausen, Matthew & Srebric, Jelena, 2017. "Building energy model calibration with schedules derived from electricity use data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 997-1007.
    9. Germán Ramos Ruiz & Carlos Fernández Bandera, 2017. "Validation of Calibrated Energy Models: Common Errors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Glasgo, Brock & Khan, Nyla & Azevedo, Inês Lima, 2020. "Simulating a residential building stock to support regional efficiency policy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    11. Sunil Kumar Mohapatra & Sushruta Mishra & Hrudaya Kumar Tripathy & Akash Kumar Bhoi & Paolo Barsocchi, 2021. "A Pragmatic Investigation of Energy Consumption and Utilization Models in the Urban Sector Using Predictive Intelligence Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.
    12. Wang, Wei & Chen, Jiayu & Huang, Gongsheng & Lu, Yujie, 2017. "Energy efficient HVAC control for an IPS-enabled large space in commercial buildings through dynamic spatial occupancy distribution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 305-323.
    13. Ang, Yu Qian & Berzolla, Zachary Michael & Reinhart, Christoph F., 2020. "From concept to application: A review of use cases in urban building energy modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    14. repec:thr:techub:v:4:y:2022:i:8:p:33-55 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Soltanaghaei, Elahe & Whitehouse, Kamin, 2018. "Practical occupancy detection for programmable and smart thermostats," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 842-855.
    16. Yang, Tao & Pan, Yiqun & Mao, Jiachen & Wang, Yonglong & Huang, Zhizhong, 2016. "An automated optimization method for calibrating building energy simulation models with measured data: Orientation and a case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1220-1231.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:techni:v:4:y:2022:i:8:p:33-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.