IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v17y2017i7p825-831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What does the Paris Agreement mean for adaptation?

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Lesnikowski
  • James Ford
  • Robbert Biesbroek
  • Lea Berrang-Ford
  • Michelle Maillet
  • Malcolm Araos
  • Stephanie E. Austin

Abstract

The Paris Agreement takes a significant step forward in strengthening the adaptation pillar of global climate policy. By widening the normative framing around adaptation, calling for stronger adaptation commitments from states, being explicit about the multilevel nature of adaptation governance, and outlining stronger transparency mechanisms for assessing adaptation progress, the Agreement is a milestone in ongoing efforts to make adaptation an equal priority with mitigation. Significant work remains to be done, however, to clarify how the long-term goal for adaptation set out in Article 7 will be meaningfully realized. The challenge for Parties in implementing the Paris Agreement will be to establish credible commitments from state and non-state actors with regard to adaptation planning, implementation, and financing.Policy relevanceThis article provides a critical view on what the Paris Agreement means for the trajectory of adaptation policy at the international and state levels in light of the stated aim of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to make adaptation an equal priority with mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Lesnikowski & James Ford & Robbert Biesbroek & Lea Berrang-Ford & Michelle Maillet & Malcolm Araos & Stephanie E. Austin, 2017. "What does the Paris Agreement mean for adaptation?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 825-831, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:17:y:2017:i:7:p:825-831
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1248889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248889
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kerstin Hotte & Su Jung Jee, 2021. "Knowledge for a warmer world: a patent analysis of climate change adaptation technologies," Papers 2108.03722, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    2. Michel Damian & Luigi De Paoli, 2017. "Climate change: Back to development," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(3), pages 5-24.
    3. Alexandra Lesnikowski & James D. Ford & Robbert Biesbroek & Lea Berrang-Ford, 2019. "A policy mixes approach to conceptualizing and measuring climate change adaptation policy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 447-469, October.
    4. Hötte, Kerstin & Jee, Su Jung, 2022. "Knowledge for a warmer world: A patent analysis of climate change adaptation technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Reckien, Diana & Buzasi, Attila & Olazabal, Marta & Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis & Eckersley, Peter & Simoes, Sofia G. & Salvia, Monica & Pietrapertosa, Filomena & Fokaides, Paris & Goonesekera, Sascha M. , 2023. "Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3, pages 1-14.
    6. Robbert Biesbroek & Jeroen J. L. Candel, 2020. "Mechanisms for policy (dis)integration: explaining food policy and climate change adaptation policy in the Netherlands," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(1), pages 61-84, March.
    7. Hötte, Kerstin & Jee, Su Jung, 2021. "Knowledge for a warmer world: a patent analysis of climate change adaptation technologies," INET Oxford Working Papers 2021-19, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    8. Graham McDowell & Leila Harris & Michele Koppes & Martin F. Price & Kai M.A. Chan & Dhawa G. Lama, 2020. "From needs to actions: prospects for planned adaptations in high mountain communities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 953-972, November.
    9. Javier Gonzales-Iwanciw & Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen & Art Dewulf, 2023. "How does the UNFCCC enable multi-level learning for the governance of adaptation?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-25, March.
    10. Syed Mahbubur Rahman, 2021. "Sustainability challenges of adaptation interventions: do the challenges vary with implementing organizations?," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Matteo Roggero & Leonhard Kähler & Achim Hagen, 2019. "Strategic cooperation for transnational adaptation: lessons from the economics of climate change mitigation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 395-410, October.
    12. Maria Antonia Tigre, 2019. "Building a regional adaptation strategy for Amazon countries," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 411-427, October.
    13. Sadiye Oktay & Serdar Bozkurt & Kübra Yazıcı, 2021. "The Relationship Between Carbon Disclosure Project Scores and Global 500 Companies: A Perspective From National Culture," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    14. Michel Damian & Luigi de Paoli, 2018. "Climate change: Back to development," Post-Print hal-01870974, HAL.
    15. Martin Munashe Chari & Leocadia Zhou & Hamisai Hamandawana, 2023. "Linking Satellite, Land Capability, and Socio-Economic Data for Local-Level Climate-Change-Adaptive Capacity Assessments and Decision Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:17:y:2017:i:7:p:825-831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.