Why economists dislike a lump of labor
AbstractThe lump-of-labor fallacy has been called one of the “best known fallacies in economics.” It is widely cited in disparagement of policies for reducing the standard hours of work, yet the authenticity of the fallacy claim is questionable, and explanations of it are inconsistent and contradictory. This article discusses recent occurrences of the fallacy claim and investigates anomalies in the claim and its history. S.J. Chapman's coherent and formerly highly regarded theory of the hours of labor is reviewed, and it is shown how that theory could lend credence to the job-creating potentiality of shorter working time policies. It concludes that substituting a dubious fallacy claim for an authentic economic theory may have obstructed fruitful dialogue about working time and the appropriate policies for regulating it.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Review of Social Economy.
Volume (Year): 65 (2007)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRSE20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
Blog mentionsAs found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
- Fawcett: "The Regulation of the Hours of Labour by the State" (abridged) IV
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2009-08-31 20:07:00
- Number One!
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2009-08-02 03:22:00
- Only So Much Boilerplate to Go Round
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2009-07-17 02:17:00
- Jobless Recovery v. Working Less
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2009-07-10 18:39:00
- No Evidence that Business Week Economics Editor Knows What He is Talking About
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2009-07-09 15:56:00
- The Danger of Boilerplate
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2009-06-18 18:32:00
- Those Wacky Europeans!
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2009-05-08 00:03:00
- Bailouts and JAWBS
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2008-11-20 18:18:00
- Invitation to Ryan Avent for a Debate
by Sandwichman in ecological headstand on 2011-08-25 20:21:00
- What's Wrong with the Case AGAINST Shorter Work? VI
by Sandwichman in The Lump of Labor on 2011-12-16 00:50:00
- Megan McArdle: As the Lump Crumbles...
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2013-06-18 23:30:00
- Labour Markets: "A crazy explanation for what is happening to workers"
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2014-01-22 23:48:00
- Basic Econometrics: Robots Demand Shorter Hours!
by Sandwichman in EconoSpeak on 2014-01-29 22:52:00
- James Banks & Richard Blundell & Antoine Bozio & Carl Emmerson, 2010.
"Releasing jobs for the young? Early retirement and youth unemployment in the United Kingdom,"
IFS Working Papers
W10/02, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
- James Banks & Richard Blundell & Antoine Bozio & Carl Emmerson, 2010. "Releasing Jobs for the Young? Early Retirement and Youth Unemployment in the United Kingdom," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Programs and Retirement around the World: The Relationship to Youth Employment, pages 319-344 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Zhang, Chuanchuan, 2012. "The relationship between elderly employment and youth employment: evidence from China," MPRA Paper 37221, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Zhang, Chuanchuan & Zhao, Yaohui, 2012.
[Will Postponing Retirement Crowd out Youth Employment?]," MPRA Paper 52931, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2013.
- Zhang, Chuanchuan, 2012.
[Will Postponing Retirement Crowd out Youth Employment?]," MPRA Paper 49811, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2012.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.