IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v14y2010i3p37-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transaction Cost Politics and Local Service Production

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Wook Kwon
  • In Won Lee
  • Richard C. Feiock

Abstract

While scholars of urban policy have relied on economic theories of transaction cost in examining local service delivery, less attention has been paid to the role of political transaction costs in local service production choices and changes. Based on a transaction cost politics perspective, this research investigates how city governments’ selection of service production is influenced by political actors’ calculation of political efficacy. Empirical analysis lends support for the idea that the choice of service production arrangements is an outcome of interaction among four political actors - elected officials, managers, line employees, and constituents -who each strategically promote their self-interested career goals in the political process. Controlling for service characteristics, community characteristics, and market size, evidence reveals that changes in service production arrangements are influenced by political and administrative institutions as well the economic situations of citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Wook Kwon & In Won Lee & Richard C. Feiock, 2010. "Transaction Cost Politics and Local Service Production," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 37-52, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:14:y:2010:i:3:p:37-52
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2010.10805160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805160
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tobias Johansson, 2015. "A Critical Appraisal of the Current Use of Transaction Cost Explanations for Government Make-Or-Buy Choices: Towards a Contingent Theory and Forms of Tests," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 661-678, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:14:y:2010:i:3:p:37-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.