IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v21y2021i1p143-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanics of good trade execution in the framework of linear temporary market impact

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio Bellani
  • Damiano Brigo

Abstract

We define the concept of good trade execution and we construct explicit adapted good trade execution strategies in the framework of linear temporary market impact. Good trade execution strategies are dynamic, in the sense that they react to the actual realisation of the traded asset price path over the trading period; this is paramount in volatile regimes, where price trajectories can considerably deviate from their expected value. Remarkably, however, the implementation of our strategies does not require the full specification of an SDE evolution for the traded asset price, making them robust across different models. Moreover, rather than minimising the expected trading cost, good trade execution strategies minimise trading costs in a pathwise sense, a point of view not yet considered in the literature. The mathematical apparatus for such a pathwise minimisation hinges on certain random Young differential equations that correspond to the Euler–Lagrange equations of the classical Calculus of Variations. These Young differential equations characterise our good trade execution strategies in terms of an initial value problem that allows for easy implementations.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Bellani & Damiano Brigo, 2021. "Mechanics of good trade execution in the framework of linear temporary market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 143-163, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:143-163
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2020.1814395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2020.1814395
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2020.1814395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William M. Boyce, 1970. "Stopping Rules for Selling Bonds," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 1(1), pages 27-53, Spring.
    2. Jim Gatheral & Alexander Schied, 2011. "Optimal Trade Execution Under Geometric Brownian Motion In The Almgren And Chriss Framework," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 353-368.
    3. Charles-Albert Lehalle & Eyal Neuman, 2019. "Incorporating signals into optimal trading," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 275-311, April.
    4. David Easley & Marcos Lopez Prado & Maureen O'Hara, 2015. "Optimal Execution Horizon," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 640-672, July.
    5. Christoph Belak & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Kevin Ou, 2018. "Optimal Trading with General Signals and Liquidation in Target Zone Models," Papers 1808.00515, arXiv.org.
    6. Damiano Brigo & Clément Piat, 2018. "Static Versus Adapted Optimal Execution Strategies in Two Benchmark Trading Models," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kathrin Glau & Daniël Linders & Aleksey Min & Matthias Scherer & Lorenz Schneider & Rudi Zagst (ed.), Innovations in Insurance, Risk- and Asset Management, chapter 10, pages 239-273, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Bertsimas, Dimitris & Lo, Andrew W., 1998. "Optimal control of execution costs," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 1-50, April.
    8. Damiano Brigo & Giuseppe Di Graziano, 2014. "Optimal trade execution under displaced diffusions dynamics across different risk criteria," Journal of Financial Engineering (JFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(02), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Bellani & Damiano Brigo & Alex Done & Eyal Neuman, 2018. "Static vs Adaptive Strategies for Optimal Execution with Signals," Papers 1811.11265, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    2. 'Alvaro Cartea & Fayc{c}al Drissi & Marcello Monga, 2023. "Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Execution and Speculation," Papers 2307.03499, arXiv.org.
    3. Masashi Ieda, 2015. "A dynamic optimal execution strategy under stochastic price recovery," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(04), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Damiano Brigo & Clement Piat, 2016. "Static vs adapted optimal execution strategies in two benchmark trading models," Papers 1609.05523, arXiv.org.
    5. M. Alessandra Crisafi & Andrea Macrina, 2016. "Simultaneous Trading In ‘Lit’ And Dark Pools," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(08), pages 1-33, December.
    6. Philippe Bergault & Fayc{c}al Drissi & Olivier Gu'eant, 2021. "Multi-asset optimal execution and statistical arbitrage strategies under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck dynamics," Papers 2103.13773, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    7. Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2023. "Optimal Portfolio Execution in a Regime-switching Market with Non-linear Impact Costs: Combining Dynamic Program and Neural Network," Papers 2306.08809, arXiv.org.
    8. Olivier Guéant & Charles-Albert Lehalle, 2015. "General Intensity Shapes In Optimal Liquidation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 457-495, July.
    9. Fengpei Li & Vitalii Ihnatiuk & Ryan Kinnear & Anderson Schneider & Yuriy Nevmyvaka, 2022. "Do price trajectory data increase the efficiency of market impact estimation?," Papers 2205.13423, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    10. Michael Karpe, 2020. "An overall view of key problems in algorithmic trading and recent progress," Papers 2006.05515, arXiv.org.
    11. Christopher Lorenz & Alexander Schied, 2013. "Drift dependence of optimal trade execution strategies under transient price impact," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 743-770, October.
    12. Guanxing Fu & Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia, 2022. "Portfolio liquidation games with self‐exciting order flow," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1020-1065, October.
    13. Julien Vaes & Raphael Hauser, 2018. "Optimal Trade Execution with Uncertain Volume Target," Papers 1810.11454, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    14. Masashi Ieda, 2015. "A dynamic optimal execution strategy under stochastic price recovery," Papers 1502.04521, arXiv.org.
    15. Felix Dammann & Giorgio Ferrari, 2023. "Optimal execution with multiplicative price impact and incomplete information on the return," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 713-768, July.
    16. Choi, Jin Hyuk & Larsen, Kasper & Seppi, Duane J., 2019. "Information and trading targets in a dynamic market equilibrium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 22-49.
    17. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    18. Dammann, Felix & Ferrari, Giorgio, 2022. "Optimal Execution with Multiplicative Price Impact and Incomplete Information on the Return," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 663, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    19. M. Alessandra Crisafi & Andrea Macrina, 2014. "Simultaneous Trading in 'Lit' and Dark Pools," Papers 1405.2023, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2016.
    20. Phillip Monin, 2014. "Hedging Market Risk in Optimal Liquidation," Working Papers 14-08, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:143-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.